Pulling Energy from the Vacuum - Lt. Col. Thomas Bearden

www.hyiq.org/downloads/guidelines%20to%20Bucking%20Coils.pdf

Tom Bearden[/b] has shown diagrammatically what he was talking about above. Simply, two (2) Electromagnetic Waves, each opposing each other. A Wave and its Anti Wave, A1 and A2.


Ref: www.cheniere.org/techpapers/sweet%20bearden%201991/sweet%20bearden%201991.htm

I quote from Tom Bearden’s Web Site:
“About seven years ago, the author was privileged to see and examine an invention of Mr. Floyd Sweet, that produced about 6 watts of electrical power from the vacuum itself.
This remarkable device, which the author dubbed a vacuum triode, in a single unit utilized most of the scalar EM concepts the author had so painfully and slowly formulated over the years.
Sweet, a brilliant inventor with a remarkable knowledge of magnetics, had utilized barium ferrite magnets and special coils to produce a solid-state device that successfully tapped the vacuum energy.”

Please take note: “special coils”!!! Please note, for the purpose of this document, I have set the text “special coils” (Bucking Coils) to bold and Underlined.
I also would like to quote from the same page; ”As is well-known, a stress can be decomposed into opposing sets of forces.”

If the reader has not seen the video: “Radionics at a Distance”, please invest and watch this video. Portions of this video are by far the best work of Tom Bearden.

In conjunction with the Whittaker Papers, as Tom Bearden has always stated, Wave and its Anti-Wave must be paired.

Scalar Wave
This term Scalar and how so many loosely use it, as if its magical, is very frustrating for me. Again it’s a definition that’s so loosely thrown around that not even 2 out of a million people could get the same answer!!! Let alone it being the right answer! Its slang terms for a Wave/Anti Wave pair.

Definition:
A Wave Pair (Wave / Anti-Wave) that Sum to Vector Zero. Stress Wave. A Wave that stands in Place.
Very simple, no complexity to this.
However, the Term Scalar was used in history to mean: “(of a quantity) having only magnitude, not direction.” As with all wave’s, the Magnitude must change with Time if one is to define the Wave in the Cartesian Coordinate System. Simply, x, y and z relative to Time t.

Lenz’s Law
Lenz’s Law directly is responsible for the “Conservation of energy”, a long history is behind this, and without a doubt is a very interesting subject to study! What is Lenz’s Law? Lenz’s Law states:
“A law stating that the direction of an induced current is always such as to oppose the change in the circuit or the magnetic field that produces it.”

Perhaps the most famous Physicist of all time, Sir Richard Feynman said: “So you see that the real energy change is the negative of the Mechanical Work and that’s why I keep writing this as E Artificial. Because the true energy of the world is the negative of E Artificial in this case is 𝝁.𝑩 I just want point out that difference in time, but that’s just interesting.”
Ref: V2 Ch15 Vector Potential – 16:32 - Audio Lecture.

So let’s investigate Lenz’s Law in some depth. Much of which is not in many Text Books simply because it’s not properly understood!

Loop A is the Bottom Loop and Loop B is the Top Loop. Loop A is our Primary Coil in our imaginary Transformer. Loop B is our Secondary Coil.
If Loop B, our Secondary, is not connected to our Load, then Lenz’s Law is not in effect, because no Current is flowing in Loop B, our Secondary.

If Current is Flowing in our Secondary, the Current Flow is in the opposing direction to the Primary, this Creates a Magnetic Field in the opposing direction.
Lenz’s Law, is primarily Magnetic in Nature. It is the direct result of Current Flow in the Secondary Coil.
This means, if we were able to turn off the Magnetic, but at the same time keep the Electric components, there would be no Reflected Power on the primary.

In the above diagram, notice the Charge Carriers, moving in the opposing direction to each other.
The Sine changes in the Induction Cycle in our Transformer and the Magnetic Field in our Secondary Changes Direction as a result. For this part of the cycle, the Magnetic Field is in reverse to the fore mentioned example.

The direction of moving Charge Carriers also change direction. This is simply, a Sine Wave output on the Transformer Terminals.

Important: Here we can see that when the Transformer is loaded, there is a NET ZERO Magnetic Field. This means the Ampere Turns on the primary are equal but opposite to the Ampere Turns on the secondary, or close to it. This is Tom Bearden’s Whittaker Wave/Anti Wave. Where the Vector of each Magnetic Field sum’s to ZERO!!! Please read on as this is not Tom Bearden’s intended use!
Our Transformer’s Primary Coil sees Reflected Power (Lenz’s law), this Reflected Power must be compensated for, because this reflected power = −𝑑𝑃ℎ𝑖𝑑𝑡, emphasising the Negative Sign, and as a
result the input Current must increase to support the Magnetic Field and push the Transformer through the BH Curve.

For more information on the flow of Charge Carriers, see the Right Hand Rule. This Rule is without a doubt one of the most important rules in all of history.
So now we have some idea on Lenz’s Law. What can we do to try to eliminate or reduce this Secondary Induced Magnetic Field? Well surely by now the answers should be clear!

This is simply, Tom Bearden’s Wave / Anti-Wave, (Primary Electromagnetic Field) / (Secondary Electromagnetic Field)! The difference is that this is not what Tom Bearden was meaning when introducing this topic and is not the intended result of the uses of the Wave / Anti-Wave!!! In-fact this is why Tom Bearden says don’t destroy the Di-Pole! At least the Primary Source Di-Pole.
Do all the destroying you like on the Secondary Di-Pole! In-fact the Secondary Di-Pole is exactly where we need to work!!!

“A consequence of the law of conservation of energy is that a perpetual motion machine of the first kind cannot exist. That is to say, no system without an external energy supply can deliver an unlimited amount of energy to its surroundings.” Ref: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
The Crazy thing is, the Atom is and always has been for all of eternity, without a Battery, and is still in continuous motion. So does NATURE agree with the statements contained in the “Conservation of energy”? The Atom is not an isolated system, however, and for that fact, a Generator is not either.
Simply put, if Lenz’s Law could be by passed, then every Generator on the planet could be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind!

Isn’t it silly how a “Law of Nature” can determine so much of history? Yes, the Conventional way of thinking, does limit us to Lenz’s Law Restrictions in our Generators, but it’s only because we have not been smart enough to allow this to change in history. As a result, we are still bound today by a law that is not valid under certain conditions.

Question: Why is a Magnetic Field not detectable in every piece of matter in the universe?
Answer: Because it’s neighbour, and its neighbour and all the neighbours around them all CANCEL each other out. Does this sound familiar? Only when an Alignment process (Magnetisation) occurs, does all the Atoms Align, Spin Up and Spin Down, and there then exhibits a Magnetic Field in Matter!!!