www.gia.edu/doc/Synthetic-Gem-Materials-in-the-2000s.pdf
Welcome to the RTH Forum!
a comprehensive lapidary arts forum community
Established in 2002, the Rock Tumbling Hobby Forum has long been the internet's most important resource for rock tumblers, lapidary artists, jewelry makers, and rockhounds from around the world. Whether it's tumbling rocks, cutting slabs, identifying rocks, polishing cabochons, wire-wrapping, fixing or building lapidary equipment, or any other facet of the lapidary arts - we gather here as a helpful community ready to assist you as you learn and grow with us.
Quick-links - where on the RTH Forum would you like to visit?
Recent Forum Discussion Threads
by vegasjames
by dillonf
by MadMax
by khara
by gemfreak95
by Mark K
by knave
by Mark K
by rocknewb101
by ashley
by vegasjames
by stardiamond
by chris1956
by Tommy
by vegasjames
Most Recent Post
by vegasjames
by vegasjames
From the FTC:
www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2019/04/warning-letters-re-mined-diamond-sellers-describe-products-accurately
"The Guides caution marketers not to use the name of any precious stone, including diamonds, to describe a simulated or laboratory-created stone, unless the name is immediately preceded by a clear disclosure of the nature of the product and that it’s not a mined stone. The Guides put it this way:
It is unfair or deceptive to use the word “ruby,” “sapphire,” “emerald,” “topaz,” or the name of any other precious or semi-precious stone, or the word “stone,” “birthstone,” “gem,” “gemstone,” or similar term to describe a laboratory-grown, laboratory-created, [manufacturer name]-created, synthetic, imitation, or simulated stone, unless such word or name is immediately preceded with equal conspicuousness by the word “laboratory-grown,” “laboratory-created,” “[manufacturer name]-created,” or some other word or phrase of like meaning, or by the word “imitation” or “simulated,” so as to disclose clearly the nature of the product and the fact it is not a mined gemstone.
The warning letters also advise marketers not to describe simulated diamonds in a way that may falsely imply they have the same optical, physical, and chemical properties of mined diamonds. Here’s the relevant provision in the Guides:
It is unfair or deceptive to use the word “laboratory-grown,” “laboratory-created,” “[manufacturer name]-created,” “synthetic,” or other word or phrase of like meaning with the name of any natural stone to describe any industry product unless such product has essentially the same optical, physical, and chemical properties as the stone named."
"Clarify your use of “diamond.” According to FTC staff, some ads showed pictures that appear to be diamond jewelry or use the word “diamond” without disclosing close to the product depiction or name, or in the product description, that it was a lab-created or simulated stone. Hashtags and URLs can convey claims, too. That’s why advertisers who sell lab-created or simulated products should exercise caution about using #diamonds or domain names that include the word “diamond.”
Don’t assume that consumers will understand your marketing terminology. Some of the warning letters went to companies that described their lab-created or simulated stones with proprietary phrases that FTC staff thought could be deceptive to consumers without more explanation. Advertisers should avoid lingo that could leave buyers with a misimpression about the nature of the product.
Keep your descriptions consistent. In one Instagram ad cited in the warning letters, the company described some of its diamonds as “cultured” and others as “lab grown.” FTC staff was concerned that the inconsistent descriptors could create a false impression in consumers’ minds that the “cultured diamonds” are mined, rather than laboratory-created."
www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2019/04/warning-letters-re-mined-diamond-sellers-describe-products-accurately
"The Guides caution marketers not to use the name of any precious stone, including diamonds, to describe a simulated or laboratory-created stone, unless the name is immediately preceded by a clear disclosure of the nature of the product and that it’s not a mined stone. The Guides put it this way:
It is unfair or deceptive to use the word “ruby,” “sapphire,” “emerald,” “topaz,” or the name of any other precious or semi-precious stone, or the word “stone,” “birthstone,” “gem,” “gemstone,” or similar term to describe a laboratory-grown, laboratory-created, [manufacturer name]-created, synthetic, imitation, or simulated stone, unless such word or name is immediately preceded with equal conspicuousness by the word “laboratory-grown,” “laboratory-created,” “[manufacturer name]-created,” or some other word or phrase of like meaning, or by the word “imitation” or “simulated,” so as to disclose clearly the nature of the product and the fact it is not a mined gemstone.
The warning letters also advise marketers not to describe simulated diamonds in a way that may falsely imply they have the same optical, physical, and chemical properties of mined diamonds. Here’s the relevant provision in the Guides:
It is unfair or deceptive to use the word “laboratory-grown,” “laboratory-created,” “[manufacturer name]-created,” “synthetic,” or other word or phrase of like meaning with the name of any natural stone to describe any industry product unless such product has essentially the same optical, physical, and chemical properties as the stone named."
"Clarify your use of “diamond.” According to FTC staff, some ads showed pictures that appear to be diamond jewelry or use the word “diamond” without disclosing close to the product depiction or name, or in the product description, that it was a lab-created or simulated stone. Hashtags and URLs can convey claims, too. That’s why advertisers who sell lab-created or simulated products should exercise caution about using #diamonds or domain names that include the word “diamond.”
Don’t assume that consumers will understand your marketing terminology. Some of the warning letters went to companies that described their lab-created or simulated stones with proprietary phrases that FTC staff thought could be deceptive to consumers without more explanation. Advertisers should avoid lingo that could leave buyers with a misimpression about the nature of the product.
Keep your descriptions consistent. In one Instagram ad cited in the warning letters, the company described some of its diamonds as “cultured” and others as “lab grown.” FTC staff was concerned that the inconsistent descriptors could create a false impression in consumers’ minds that the “cultured diamonds” are mined, rather than laboratory-created."
It's a Jenkins "royal" saw.
Check the bearing carrier, make sure it's tight to the arbor
Is there any way to tell what size blade it was designed for? The current 16" blade has barely more than an inch of clearance from the back housing. I'm not sure how close you are supposed to get.
They sold a 14/16 and a 18". Might fit an 18", looks like an 18" model 2 based on the bearing carrier
by vegasjames
That does verify what I mentioned earlier about extracting the carbon from the rest of the cremation ashes.
One thing I would question in this article though is where the author writes:
"Furthermore, just like with other types of lab-made diamonds, the Federal Trade Commission has confirmed that cremation diamonds can be marketed as real and genuine diamonds because, just like “natural” diamonds, they are “pure carbon crystalized in the isometric system.”"
The reason is that these are not natural diamonds, they are synthetic diamonds. And the FTC does not allow other synthetic gemstones to be referred to as "real", which implies natural. Synthetic stones such as sapphires including ruby, alexandrite, etc. have to be listed as synthetic stones or lab grown, not as real stones.
Same with simulants such as diamond substitutes such as YAG or aluminum oxide "diamonds", which must be marketed as simulants.
www.forbes.com/sites/pamdanziger/2018/08/02/what-the-ftc-diamond-ruling-means-for-consumers-and-diamond-marketers/?sh=4ac6fdb020fa
nationaljeweler.com/articles/956-a-quick-review-of-the-ftc-s-rules-on-lab-grown-diamonds
The Forbes article really sucks. For instance, they imply something synthetic is fake, which is not true. Again, if a sapphire is synthesized that does make it fake. It is still real sapphire, it has just been produced synthetically. If it were a simulant instead of a synthetic, then it would be fake.
And their claim that you cannot synthesize elements it total bullshit. For example, it is super simple to synthesize carbon by burning sugar with a torch. Pure copper can be synthesized by reducing copper oxide through high heat in the presence of hydrogen gas. I can give numerous other examples.
As for diamond, the process of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is synthesizing carbon from methane, which is then synthesized in to a crystalline form. I first heard of CVD diamonds over 30 years ago, and experimented with a similar process at the time. Originally the process involved using a heated tungsten coil to knock the carbon out of methane forming diamond. Later then went to microwaves to do the same thing. Changing the gas methane to free carbon and hydrogen gas is synthesis.
At no point in the article though did they say anything about lab grown diamonds can be old simply as diamond.
As for your second article, they back what I was saying where I wrote:
"The FTC says they still must make it clear that the product is man-made by using “clear and conspicuous” disclosure with the word diamond; the three terms the FTC recommends using are laboratory-grown, laboratory-created or [manufacturer name]-created.
Cultured is OK too, but it has to be “immediately accompanied, with equal conspicuousness” by one of the three terms; it cannot stand alone.
When “diamond” appears by itself, it still means a natural diamond."
Cultured is OK too, but it has to be “immediately accompanied, with equal conspicuousness” by one of the three terms; it cannot stand alone.
When “diamond” appears by itself, it still means a natural diamond."
Amazon Affiliate Link
Please follow this link every time before you shop at Amazon.com. As an Amazon Associate we earn money from all qualifying purchases you make after following our links. This program generates a small amount of revenue for us and helps cover forum expenses such as hosting and keeping the forum "ad free" for registered members, and it doesn't cost you a penny extra on your purchases.
Forum Statistics
Total Threads: 100,358
Total Posts: 1,274,576
Total Members: 16,899
Newest Member: azmclovin
Most Users Online: 1,765 (Apr 29, 2021 23:29:36 GMT -5)
RTH Member Birthdays Today
albionfireandice, alexander, camaren, celestial, cookedduck, foreverbored16, h0mstednh0nysukle, herk, holter7707, jadeezombiee, landwave, lorney, miatria, mikie, muk4821, no1crzyldy, ragtimeman, rockster, ryanblackburn, sandsave, sandsave1, schistforbrains, shady33, shady33shady, singlerock, velemoochi
RTH Store - Recent Items
Support your favorite forum by purchasing Teeshirts, Mugs, and more through the RTH Store on Etsy.
Recent Threads
by vegasjames
by dillonf
by MadMax
by khara
by gemfreak95
by Mark K
by knave
by Mark K
by rocknewb101
RTH Forum Top Posters Hall of Fame
jamesp | 36,154 |
rockjunquie | 32,580 |
Fossilman | 20,661 |
Sabre52 | 20,452 |
mohs | 19,412 |
jasoninsd | 16,731 |
Bikerrandy | 15,688 |
stefan | 14,094 |
Cher | 14,072 |
hummingbirdstones | 13,740 |
Toad | 12,797 |
jakesrocks | 12,696 |
Tommy | 12,567 |
Chat Box v.2
Members with real questions or comments that need an actual response, please post on the main forum - not here!
Casual PG-13 posts only, no politics or religion please!
ast530: Well so far I've managed to botch the free cloud photo sharing account and I'm overwhelmed! But as is obvious I was able to manage my Avatar pic! LOL Anywho--I'm a rock FANATIC. I live in Chico, California very near the great rolling waters of the Sacramev
Mar 14, 2024 19:41:15 GMT -5
ast530: I'm so happy to be here and I know I will learn much from everyone...
Mar 14, 2024 19:41:46 GMT -5
1dave:
Mar 16, 2024 6:31:03 GMT -5
ThomasT:
Mar 17, 2024 16:17:36 GMT -5
Rockoonz: dillonf sorry to hear, you have my prayers as a 2x recipient of that nasty bug. Hope you got one of the milder strains.
Mar 18, 2024 12:47:59 GMT -5
amygdule:
Mar 18, 2024 20:55:14 GMT -5