snivlem
starting to spend too much on rocks
Member since February 2008
Posts: 167
|
Post by snivlem on Feb 11, 2008 16:34:53 GMT -5
should I start with something bigger? I am a newbie, and forsee this being a minor hobby. I want to process cabs after I have cut them on my WF, and figure a vibratory tumbler is the way to go. The Mini-Sonic only does 2.2 lbs, or about 2 cups, and the TV-5 does 4 pounds. I have just heard good things about the Mini-Sonic brand, and only so-so reviews of the Raytechs. These would put me out just over $100, and that would be a great way to see how much I like this hobby, but I don't want the tumbler to be too small to be useful. Thanks in advance- snivlem
|
|
|
Post by deb193redux on Feb 11, 2008 18:17:20 GMT -5
I think more folks here use withe UV-10 or Lot-O. Have you eliminated these?
Also, about 1/3 or more of that weight will be ceramic media. So take that into account.
Finally, tumbling shapes that have had some preliminary rough rounding onthe side of the saw blade is exactly where I began. It worked OK for me in the LOt-O. But let me ask, how perfected do you want these finished shapes to be?
I did get to the point where I wanted a little more rounding, which vibes are not good at. I eventually added a visit to a 100g wheel for some shapes before I tumbled them. With or w/o a wheel, you can get shapes OK for pendants or wire-wrapping - but not for putting into settings. Getting the calibrated size, or the bezel is just not likely in the tumbler. If you want a more flat/rustic look. Charge ahead. I just want to make sure you are not picturing a cup or two of well domed, settable cabs.
I also got to the point where I wanted to have a few batches going. I eventyally got 3 different vibes, (and a rotary I meant to repair.)
I think the mini-soonic will be a bit small after you add ceramic pellets. For the same amount of time checking each day, spritzing with water, washing and recharging ... etc - well it is nice to come out with more than 1.5 cups of finished shapes. If you don;t have enough pre-shapes for any batch, you can always put in more ceramic to fill the bowl, so why risk going too small.
|
|
snivlem
starting to spend too much on rocks
Member since February 2008
Posts: 167
|
Post by snivlem on Feb 11, 2008 18:39:48 GMT -5
Thanks, Deb.
I was kinda leaning towards the TV-5. For about $115 shipped, it seems like it would do what I need. Do you think it's worth an extra 45-50 for the Lot-O? And how much could I find a UV-10 for?
I am not looking to make anything for settings at all just yet, but I really appreciate your insight. I think wire-wrapping is where it's at for me, and also just free-form art pieces.
Could I get decent edges by grinding using the side of the blade, and then finishing up with my dremel and lapidary bits before tumbling?
I just cut my first batch of cabs today, I will take some pics and post them as soon as I can, maybe I could get some advice-
Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by Bikerrandy on Feb 11, 2008 21:59:59 GMT -5
You get what you pay for, do yourself a favor and get the Thumblers UV-10, never "settle" for cheaper. (very satisfied UV-10 owner) Oh, if you're talking about using the edge of a tile saw blade (like a Workforce), I've done it, it works. You can also use a bench grinder with a $25 silicon carbide wheel (green wheel), there's a ton of them on the internet.
|
|
|
Post by Bikerrandy on Feb 11, 2008 22:10:47 GMT -5
|
|
snivlem
starting to spend too much on rocks
Member since February 2008
Posts: 167
|
Post by snivlem on Feb 12, 2008 0:51:18 GMT -5
Why is the Thumlers better than the Raytech? Is is a better design or just a better built machine?
And how do you keep the grinding wheel wet?
|
|
|
Post by Lady B on Feb 12, 2008 1:02:25 GMT -5
Here is another relatively new thread on the topic of vibe tumblers. It might help answer some of your questions and concerns about which model will best meet your needs. forum.rocktumblinghobby.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=21864&page=1You can buy vibes outright from various vendors or you can try for a good deal at eBay but before you buy, read what has already been posted by experienced tumblers. I am still a Newbie at this hobby but I am learning...sometimes the hard way! If you can swing the funs then go for the top-grade machine. Lady B
|
|
|
Post by Bikerrandy on Feb 12, 2008 12:27:40 GMT -5
I can't personally compare my Thumblers to any other vibe, I only know what I've read. One person on here has burned up two motors in a Raytech in less than a year. I'm still using my Thumblers UV-10 after 2 1/2 years from purchase. It's always running, and I've turned out literally thousands of necklace pendants from it.
|
|
|
Post by deb193redux on Feb 12, 2008 20:53:35 GMT -5
I have a friend with a very old RayTech. The plastic bowl got a little brittle with age. I don't know of any other real problems.
|
|
snivlem
starting to spend too much on rocks
Member since February 2008
Posts: 167
|
Post by snivlem on Feb 12, 2008 21:30:02 GMT -5
Hey-how do you keep a lapidary blade wet on any ordinary grinding wheel?
And thanks for the info on the raytech, Deb!
|
|
|
Post by deb193redux on Feb 13, 2008 0:23:23 GMT -5
You can just use a spray bottle. Swap out rocks if it gets too hot. SOme folks rig a drip. Be careful not to get the motor wet.
|
|
|
Post by Bikerrandy on Feb 18, 2008 13:46:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by puppie96 on Feb 19, 2008 1:32:52 GMT -5
I would NEVER get a TV-5 again. I was happy when it rolled a 7 and I could finally upgrade. Really. I just wrote something about this in another thread recently.
I say definitely spend the extra money for the loto, which is trouble free and QUIET -- that Raytech will wake up the dead and eat you alive buying new bowls which it will wear out quickly with continuous use. Over time the loto works out to be cheaper.
|
|
|
Post by Bikerrandy on Feb 19, 2008 21:14:36 GMT -5
Same as Thumblers, the bowls last forever. I've never heard anything bad about the loto-tumbler or the Thumblers UV-10, and nobody ever seems to brag about the Raytech.
|
|
snivlem
starting to spend too much on rocks
Member since February 2008
Posts: 167
|
Post by snivlem on Feb 25, 2008 22:21:16 GMT -5
Sweet-thanks for your help everyone-I've got a bunch of cabs cut, i can't wait to tumble and polish them!
The big difference I see is the bowl shape on the Lot-O, how does that affect time, quality, etc...
Thanks!
|
|
oriongal
noticing nice landscape pebbles
Member since May 2007
Posts: 96
|
Post by oriongal on Feb 26, 2008 11:55:50 GMT -5
I have a couple of Lot-O's (one single and one dual) and 1 KG-1 mini-sonic. Which actually was two KG-1's, but the first one ate itself up (partially my fault).
You won't get much into the KG-1, and overall I'm much less impressed with it than the Lot-O. For one thing, the way it's designed (with the opening spanning the entire top, and squared off rather than rounded) it dries out extremely fast and also has a tendency to kick out slurry all over the wall, floor, and anything else that is nearby, on a regular basis. The only real advantage to it is that you can set it up just about anywhere, where the Lot-O either needs to be mounted to the floor or to a concrete block (not as difficult as it sounds though, it comes with adhesive that sticks it and holds well to either place). And my other design complaint about the Mini-Sonic is that when it does kick out slurry, it goes down into the housing and is very difficult to clean up. This is how I lost the first one, the cover came off while I was at work and a fair bit of slurry worked its way between the barrel and holder, which over a few hours managed to eat a hole in the barrel itself. Slurry really went everywhere after that, including into the motor. The Lot-O at least has the motor hung on the outside and is shielded from the barrel, so if the cover comes off and it kicks out slurry, it won't usually get into the motor.
I've also found that the action on the KG-1 is a bit rougher than the Lot-O, rolls the load around a bit faster.
|
|
snivlem
starting to spend too much on rocks
Member since February 2008
Posts: 167
|
Post by snivlem on Feb 26, 2008 15:58:00 GMT -5
now if someone will respond with experience with the lot-o and a thumler's i'll have all my questions answered.
Thanks so much oriongal!
|
|
holdemplyer
spending too much on rocks
Member since January 2008
Posts: 418
|
Post by holdemplyer on Feb 26, 2008 19:23:29 GMT -5
snivlem, do a search for UV-10, and you'll have almost all your questions answered! And find answers to questions you havn't even thought of yet. I've just started out myself, don't even have my first batch done yet, but i can tell ya, after reading through this out-freaking standing board, i was torn between the lot-o and UV-10 myself, ended up getting the UV-10, and an extra bowl (extra bowl is for polish stage ONLY). Got mine, as have most other on this board from therockshed.com.
Alex
|
|
Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,494
|
Post by Sabre52 on Feb 26, 2008 19:42:53 GMT -5
I have the small mini sonic rig I use for sanding cabs or preforms and my next vibe will be a Lot-O. Minisonic is loud, tends to shake itself apart fairly quickly and it's tumbling action is such that it's very hard to keep the load from bogging down. Plus it's very cranky about how full the barrels is too. Have never liked it much and mine's so loose now it sounds like a Huey landing when it's running fast enough to rotate the load. I've heard lots of good things about the Lot-O and Shawn at the Rockshed says it is one of the quieter rigs around...Mel
|
|
oriongal
noticing nice landscape pebbles
Member since May 2007
Posts: 96
|
Post by oriongal on Feb 27, 2008 8:39:39 GMT -5
I don't think I've seen anyone say they had both (Thumlers and Lot-O) - seems like most of the folks who have Thumlers have nothing but (which in itself is probably quite a testament...).
I don't think you'd be disappointed with either choice, honestly. I don't think I've seen anyone complain about either one with regard to either results or reliability. About the only complaint on the Lot-O that I've seen is that the barrels have a small (about dime-sized) dimple in the bottom that will rapidly fill up with unspent grit and/or small chips, but that's easily solved by filling it in with some epoxy or similar flexible sealant.
I would guess that where you plan to use it might be the real deciding factor in the choice. The Lot-O needing to be mounted on a heavy, solid base may pose a limit to where you can use it - but if someplace like a basement or garage is the location of choice, and you don't plan to be moving it around much, then cost would probably be the next deciding factor.
|
|