rxscram
has rocks in the head
Member since August 2011
Posts: 519
|
Post by rxscram on Sept 12, 2013 13:43:05 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Member since January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2013 15:23:59 GMT -5
juzwuz can you fit a 18" saw. This is an awesome thread! Jeff, congratulations on a nice build!
|
|
rxscram
has rocks in the head
Member since August 2011
Posts: 519
|
Post by rxscram on Sept 12, 2013 17:13:31 GMT -5
Thanks Scott!
Now taking orders... ;-)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Member since January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2013 17:18:03 GMT -5
haha! What would you sell a machine like that for?
|
|
rxscram
has rocks in the head
Member since August 2011
Posts: 519
|
Post by rxscram on Sept 12, 2013 17:19:35 GMT -5
Hmmm, I think I'd start negotiations at $1850.
|
|
panamark
fully equipped rock polisher
Member since September 2012
Posts: 1,343
|
Post by panamark on Sept 12, 2013 17:42:55 GMT -5
Excellent job! We can only slightly appreciate the amount of work that went into this I think. One question please: is the motor pivoting on the leg cross bar and then the tension adjustment accomplished by the threaded rod? If so, it looks like the threaded rod isn't secured to anything and what would keep the motor from "bouncing" under load?
Again, what a great job you did! Congrats.
|
|
|
Post by deb193redux on Sept 12, 2013 17:43:43 GMT -5
$1850 seem right. Similar design 16" that Rob makes sell on ebay for $1500.
|
|
rxscram
has rocks in the head
Member since August 2011
Posts: 519
|
Post by rxscram on Sept 12, 2013 17:56:54 GMT -5
Excellent job! We can only slightly appreciate the amount of work that went into this I think. One question please: is the motor pivoting on the leg cross bar and then the tension adjustment accomplished by the threaded rod? If so, it looks like the threaded rod isn't secured to anything and what would keep the motor from "bouncing" under load? Again, what a great job you did! Congrats. Thank you! Yes, the motor is on a plate connected to the crossbar, which pivots freely. The threaded rod is adjusted such that it just lifts the plate up slightly from where it rests with only the belt holding it up. It’s not so much to provide tension as it is to keep the whole weight of the motor from being held up by the belt. It mainly helps with adjusting pulleys… I tried a few different combinations of sizes until I got it operating where I wanted. With the threaded rod I could adjust the location of the motor to accommodate different pulley sizes without having to get a different sized belt each time. There is actually very little load on the blade while operating… the feed rate is slow enough (1 inch every 3 minutes) that the motor doesn’t jump around at all. During testing I started the blade at rest against a piece of ocean wave agate, and there was a twitch in the belt as it overcame the static inertia but it started up with no problems.
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,612
|
Post by jamesp on Sept 12, 2013 19:27:09 GMT -5
Great looking machine. Nothing like pride of building something. That is a step above. Congrats Jeff
|
|
quartz
Cave Dweller
breakin' rocks in the hot sun
Member since February 2010
Posts: 3,359
|
Post by quartz on Sept 12, 2013 23:06:27 GMT -5
Fine job! Looks like a quality build with lots of care.
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,612
|
Post by jamesp on Sept 13, 2013 5:32:13 GMT -5
Hmmm, I think I'd start negotiations at $1850. I would say $2300. And that would be at 10 - 20 per year so the materials could be bought in quantity discount and jigs set up for mass production. I sell about $5000 worth of fire pits every year and buy the materials in bulk. They sell begin and end of winter. Nice 3 month side income. Weld them on a large 'lazy susan' jig that makes it easy. Welding is all about the fixture, the cutting and the drilling. The rest is easy. That is a great home build size project business.
|
|
rxscram
has rocks in the head
Member since August 2011
Posts: 519
|
Post by rxscram on Sept 13, 2013 13:19:15 GMT -5
How do you find your customers? That's my main concern about making/selling the saws in any quantity (or at all). Once I put my design improvements into it, I can see $2300. I was just talking about my prototype for the $1850.
|
|
robsrockshop
has rocks in the head
Member since August 2012
Posts: 715
|
Post by robsrockshop on Sept 16, 2013 20:17:14 GMT -5
As someone that's done this off and on for years............don't plan on getting rich lol. Problem when asking a lot of money is that then you are trying to sell what's going to be viewed as 'homemade' vs. a production unit with a known reputation and warranty. It's hard to make a worthwhile sum and at $2300 you are only $350 less than a brand new 18" Highland Park and a new HP unit will kick this saws ass all over the place. And that's pretty sad and shows what being put on global playing field with the likes of people making 50cent an hour is good for. They should've already ran Covington and Lortone completely out of the slab saw market and it's probably just a matter of time. Then you have the flip side of trying to come in cheap and end up doing too much work for the amount of money you'll make. Everything in the US is in a total race to the bottom trying to catch up with the other countries who enslave workers. You'd have to have a hole in your head to choose a 18" Lortone over a new HP, that model has totally lost it's 'economical' selling point and is a waste of money with today's globalism. You can pop the sidewalls of the Lortone with your bare hand, it's not a true roller bearing vise it glides on steel, and it's $500 more?
I also don't like the allthread kickstand on the motor that's totally ass backwards it should come off the bottom of the tank if the pulleys don't line up spend more time with the tape measure.
I'm not saying you can't/won't make any money just don't quit your day job lol. Only other thing I noticed off hand was the 'slow' speed so you say of 1" every 3 minutes? Isn't that 20" per hour? Might want to rethink that one. I make mine about 8" per hour. Too slow for some. Don't really care. Covingtongs used to be 10" per hour and that was too slow for some now they are 12" and have even more problems than they did before.
I'd like to add that i've heard a couple complaints about the new HP's, but how many complaints do we hear about Covington and Lortone lol. After looking at them i'd have to say most of it is probably operator error. It is what it is so my as well recognize it.
In all honesty your biggest selling point is that people don't know everything I just told you. For instance i've sold a few new 16" i've built this summer for $1400. I won't be surprised if I have a harder time selling a used 18" HP for that amount. "Oh good lord Charlie, it's 30 years old!!!". LOL. For any rockhound that's been around the block that would be a no brainer.
|
|
rxscram
has rocks in the head
Member since August 2011
Posts: 519
|
Post by rxscram on Sept 17, 2013 23:17:17 GMT -5
So, since I've had so many people saying that my feed rate was too fast, I slowed it down so that it's just a hair over 10 inches per hour. The cut quality has gone from "good" to "great", so thanks for the advice.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Member since January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2013 23:25:49 GMT -5
so 20" per hour makes rough but successful cuts? What blade? Is the motor heavily loaded at that rate?
|
|
rxscram
has rocks in the head
Member since August 2011
Posts: 519
|
Post by rxscram on Sept 17, 2013 23:43:23 GMT -5
No, they weren't rough at all... they felt perfectly smooth when I ran my hand across the surface, and had a decent reflection if held perpendicular to a light. The only problem was that if you held the rock so that the surface was parallel to a light (in relation to your eyes), you could see faint saw marks. With the slower feed rate, those microscratches have all but disappeared.
The motor didn't seem heavily loaded at all at either speed. But I'd received a few comments about 20" per hour being too fast (although it was more like 17 3/4 per hour), so I thought people must know something I didn't.
|
|
robsrockshop
has rocks in the head
Member since August 2012
Posts: 715
|
Post by robsrockshop on Sept 18, 2013 7:27:45 GMT -5
For some rocks you could probably get away with cutting that fast. Put in a piece of agate that's the maximum size and end up wearing out the blade too soon among other things, not like the saw will blow up lol but this process has been well known for sometime. Might seem ok now but it won't later on, bending, binding etc are topics that often come up.
|
|
rxscram
has rocks in the head
Member since August 2011
Posts: 519
|
Post by rxscram on Sept 18, 2013 10:46:51 GMT -5
I pretty much only cut maximum sized jaspers and agates.
I'm curious... is there literature anywhere on recommended cut speeds, or is it all tribal knowledge? I couldn't find anything, but maybe part of the problem is not knowing where to look.
|
|
|
Post by deb193redux on Sept 18, 2013 11:25:53 GMT -5
Most blade manufacturers will recommend RPM or surface feet per minute (SFPM) speeds, but there is less talk of feed rate. the ideal rate will depend on how aggressive (diamond concentration and size) the blade is, and how thick the kerf, and how well coolant is flushing the cut. They can describe SFPM in terms of the properties of the metal holding the diamonds, but they can't as easily say how this changes with the rock type/size. In a way people making construction saws that will always be cutting 6" blocks of granite have an easier design challenge. Lapidaries throw all kinds of rock at their saws.
I have not seen a good writeup of feed rate. You may be right, that tribes of folks cutting certain types of material, in certain sizes, with certain types of blades, develop a wisdom that is inefficiently shared. Then again, some business profits more form faster cut even if it shortens blade life. Some hobbyists are better off with cut taking twice as long and blade lasting forever.
For me, a good test is if I can turn off the saw and the blade still turns for a second or so, and if I can restart w/o having to back off. If the blade screeches to a stop, the feed was too fast. If the saw was able to power through, but cannot restart, then the feed was too fast. If I cannot move the blade easily by hand after stopping in a cut, then the feed was either too fast, or the flush insufficient, or there are alignment problems.
Some like gravity feed (or hydraulic) because the pressure is constant and not the feed rate. Similarly, I think it could be interesting to have a faster maximum rate, but a hair trigger slip clutch. If the clutch just slipped when above a certain pressure, this would effectively deliver a variable rate. But, I think designing the perfect clutch is tricky.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Member since January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2013 11:49:58 GMT -5
It took me a long time here to understand what was going on. I was hearing very slow feed rates for cuts here and experiencing MUCH faster cuts at school. I could not gok it. We have hydraulic feed at school. Those cuts are generally well over 20" per minute with all stones. The hydraulic pressure is set and the stone moves across the blade as the cut it made. At school cuts at 1" per minute are the norm for agates and jaspers.
Push too hard you stress the rock vice and load the motor. Stress the rock vice too much and you need a new blade. The rock pops out and the blade is mangled.
I like faster cuts because with my finished product cut marks are not an issue. Nor is a person buying slabs for cabochons going to complain about some small saw marks in the slab.
Personally I am a bit frustrated with my own saw due to slow feed rates.
|
|