|
Post by krazydiamond on Jul 28, 2004 18:10:35 GMT -5
i am not altogether unpleased with this lot, the pet wood didn't take the polish as predicted nor did the Utah Wonderstone, but i will try again with some of the Tin Oxide when it arrives. the sodalite took a nice shine this time without burnishing, not as good as some of the stuff posted recently, but, hey, we got to share the triumphs as well as the mediocre.... this is the pet wood (above) close up of the sodalite and the Utah Wonderstone (upper left), great stuff, doesn't look real, will try again with this stuff as i have some more in the next batch. there is once piece of what i believe is green quartz next to the adventurine, one lone amethyst, some local granite, too.....oh, and some agate. the batch i just started is almost ALL koi jasper, a mainly purebred batch for once. i checked my stitchtite today and moved everyone along up the ladder. should have another mix ready next week. thanks for looking! KD
|
|
deepsouth
fully equipped rock polisher
He who rocks last rocks best
Member since January 2004
Posts: 1,256
|
Post by deepsouth on Jul 28, 2004 19:17:15 GMT -5
You got some beautiful rocks in there KD , and you had as much luck with your shine as I did this week But hey there is always next week to look forward too. I will have to redo mine in polish again try get the shine up. Never despair the rocks will always be there. Jack
|
|
|
Post by sandsman1 on Jul 28, 2004 19:20:14 GMT -5
hey KD i think they all came out great if you seen some of mine you would be proud of those hahahaha ---i realy like that wonderstone,,bet it would make some nice pendents cool swirly colors,, and the sodalite came out real good not alotta dings mine had alot of dings but im gonna try the wheel next time see if i can get rid of them --i like um all nice job --seeya---john
|
|
donwrob
has rocks in the head
Member since June 2003
Posts: 509
|
Post by donwrob on Jul 28, 2004 20:47:16 GMT -5
Wow, they sure look great to me KD! Super rocks, super job on them! That sodalite is killer, cheers, Don
|
|
|
Post by krazydiamond on Jul 28, 2004 21:49:15 GMT -5
thanks for all the kind comments on the not-so-hot batch, next one will be better, and if not that one, then the one afer that, one day...i will get a real good one. something to strive for. i am not above painting some of that wood clinker with urethane (shine, i'll show you how to shine, g-damiit), i am NOT a purist.
thanks again guys, (and guyettes?) KD
|
|
llanago
fully equipped rock polisher
Member since January 2004
Posts: 1,714
|
Post by llanago on Jul 28, 2004 22:30:26 GMT -5
KD, if you think that is a "motley mongrel bunch" you really are KRAZY! Those are NICE, beautiful shine and great shapes!
I could show you a motley bunch of rocks so that you will know what motley is and is not. These rocks are the latter - NOT a motley bunch!
llana
|
|
bwalters
has rocks in the head
Member since March 2004
Posts: 557
|
Post by bwalters on Jul 28, 2004 22:58:57 GMT -5
KD, Your rocks are beautiful! Why aren't you happy with them? I think you did an amazing job on them and you should be proud!
BE
|
|
Banjocreek
fully equipped rock polisher
Member since March 2003
Posts: 1,115
|
Post by Banjocreek on Jul 29, 2004 0:27:09 GMT -5
Thats a nice batch KD, and I see some good jewelry prospects in there as well. I think it's great! Keep it up!
|
|
rollingstone
starting to spend too much on rocks
Member since July 2009
Posts: 236
|
Post by rollingstone on Jul 29, 2004 2:20:03 GMT -5
I seem to have a different take on KD's comments...she said at the start that she is "not altogether unpleased", which means to me that she is fairly pleased with the lot. Maybe it's one of those half-full, half-empty things.
At any rate, I like them. I am intrigued by the close-up sodalite shot. The small rocks in the upper part of the photo appear to be quite translucent. I always thought sodalite was opaque? Translucent blue rocks -- very cool!
|
|
James
freely admits to licking rocks
Member since October 2003
Posts: 876
|
Post by James on Jul 29, 2004 2:31:13 GMT -5
Wonerful work my friend! Did you pre-form those stones?
|
|
|
Post by krazydiamond on Jul 29, 2004 7:59:52 GMT -5
yes, some of them were my first practice pieces with the saw. notably the utah wonderstone and the sqaure pieces of (?) jasper.
and yes, rollingstone, half full half empty, not bad, not as good as some. still pretty to me, labor of love thing, not a patch on what i've seen in here. still, onwards and upwards! thanks for all your comments!
KD
|
|
|
Post by Noosh9057 on Jul 29, 2004 9:58:13 GMT -5
Hay looks great!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by connrock on Jul 29, 2004 19:59:46 GMT -5
Hi KD,,,, Nice rocks but I agree with you on the quality of the sheen on them. I know that photo's usually don't do justice to our work but if my eyes are correct the rocks all look like they have a matte finish on them. One reason, (among many) , that can cause this is the pre-polishing stage. Oh boy,,,,,here I go again,,,,,, I was once asked what I use for a pre-polish and my reply was quite long. If you really think about the tumbling cycle all the steps before the polish are in fqact a pre-polish stage! I use a 20X and 30X loupe to inspect my rocks as I got through the entire process. If you take one of your rocks that has the absolutely best shine to it and look at it through the loupe you'll find that the "sheen" is in fact nuthing but a very tight matte finish!!!! The whole idea of getting the "wet look" is to make each little "hump" in the matte as tiny as possible. This all starts with the rough grind.The rough grind not only shapes your rocks it gives them a very rough matte finish. The next grit cycle MUST get the previous rough matte ground away and create a finer matte finish. This cycle continues right up to the polishing stage and if ANY of the previous "pre-polish" stages haven't done their job you will NEVER get a good sheen to your rocks! Another reason for a poor finish is mixing rocks of different hardness. I looked up the rocks in your photos and here's what I came up with: Aventurine -------------------------------------------7 Amethyst (quartz) ---------------------------------7 Agate (quartz) -------------------------------6.5 - 7 Green Quartz ---------------------------------------7 Granite (quartz + feldspar) ---------------------7 Sodalite ---------------------------------------5.5 - 6 Wonderstone ------------------------------------6.5 You have material which can be as low as 5.5 going all the way up to 7 on the Mohs scale of hardness. I can't remember and maybe someone can help us out here but if my memory serves me right the scale can be a little deceiving to an ameture (like me) as the difference between,lets say a 6 and a 7 is quite a BIG difference! I "think" the hardness actually doubles between a rock of a 6 and a rock of a 7! So if your trying to polish rocks varying from 5.5 - 7 you have quite a bit of range in hardness! A perfect example of this is with obsidian. If you collect obsidian from the same collecting area but go from one spot to another the obsidian can and most times will differ in hardness therefore making it very hard to polish.This,I believe is one of the reasons people have such a tough time polishing obsidian! Just a thought KD and I hope you DO NOT take offence in my attempt to give a little constructive criticism! I really don't think we are really helping each other to our copacity because we don't want to hurt anyones feelings but,,,,,,,,,,,,, If anyone takes offence to my thoughts and or suggestions P L E A S E P L E A S E P L E A S E let me know.I am NOT trying to hurt anyone I'm just trying to help. Tom
|
|
|
Post by krazydiamond on Jul 29, 2004 20:17:16 GMT -5
i would never take offesnse and am always open to suggestion, but look at the pics again, Tom, the sodalite took the best shine.....so did the harder rocks, i mean one piece of amethyst and one piece of adventurine didnt spoil the batch (as far as fracturing the softer stone), the polish took to the rocks above 5 MOH and not to the others, no big deal. this is the first time i'd tried "clinker" pet wood, that is why i posted a question earlier about it......and the first time i'd tried the wonderstone....i used mucho pelletinos (yee hah), too.
half the fun of this, besides asking the questions, is experimenting on your own, kinda like driving the Wok....so, do feel free to critique, but share in the joy of a not-so-failed experiment... i like doing mixed stuff and try to be aware of the MOH diff, now that i have more tumblers and have been gleaning good advice in here, i will improve. thanks for the input, KD
|
|
deepsouth
fully equipped rock polisher
He who rocks last rocks best
Member since January 2004
Posts: 1,256
|
Post by deepsouth on Jul 29, 2004 20:19:53 GMT -5
Wow Tom , I had not looked at the sheen the way you describe it . But it SURE makes sense. My question to you is , should we lenghten the prepolish cycle and if so , by how many days , Or should we look at the rocks with a strong loupe and let that decide? I take it that we should also renew the charge of prepolish grit.
Thanks for your informative writing.
Not offensive at all !!
Jack
|
|
|
Post by cookie3rocks on Jul 29, 2004 20:35:07 GMT -5
I've been playing with my dremel and have kinda been judging hardness from that. I was suprised that the sodalite was much more difficult to shape than any of the quartz. I realise it has a lower Mohs rating, but why is it such a bugger to polish? And , KD, by the way, your sodalite is outstanding. Bet it made Sandman drool. I just started a batch of rose quartz, sodalite, amathyst and adventutrine believing the hardness was similar. Wish me luck!
cookie
|
|
rollingstone
starting to spend too much on rocks
Member since July 2009
Posts: 236
|
Post by rollingstone on Jul 30, 2004 2:01:07 GMT -5
Cookie, the rose quartz, amethyst and adventurine are all varieties of quartz, hardness 7. The sodalite only has a Mohs hardness of 5.5, so you might want to keep an eye on that one.
|
|
|
Post by connrock on Jul 30, 2004 21:54:13 GMT -5
Hi KD,,,,,,,,, PHEW!!!! Boy am I happy you didn't get ticked off at me! You've really got me puzzled as to why the sodalite came out the best!!! I have NO idea why and I hope someone whoe DOES know jumps in here and lets us know!!! Tom
|
|
|
Post by connrock on Jul 30, 2004 22:23:08 GMT -5
Hi Jack,,,,, I do "most" (99%) of my prepolishing in my vibe units which it VERY easy to check on what's going on.I just pop off the cover and pluck out a rock and inspect it.I do the same with the other grit stages as well. I DO NOT EVER recharge the prepolish!! In a rotary tumbler the grit breaks down in 1/2 about every 7 - 10 days.In other words,if you are using a 220 grit it will break down 1/2 to a 440 grit in 7 - 10 days. In a vibe unit the same thing happens but at a MUCH faster rate.In most cases it will break 1/2 in about 12 - 16 hrs!!! Knowing this,we want our rocks to have the finest group of "bumps" as we can possibly get before the polis stage.So,,,if we let our prepolish run for a long period of time so it breaks down in 1/2 and then let it run again for the same amount of time we "should" be able to see our rocks actually have a fairly nice sheen on them!!If not,,,,,,,back they go for another run. If you do this you should have some very nice looking rocks when they're finished. As for the loupe inspection the best way I know of getting use to seeing what you are supposed to is to do a little experimenting. Try this: The next batch of rocks you're going to start,take a random piece of the rough you're going to tumble and save it and record the type of rock,the date and the size and amount of grit you're using. When you are satisfied with the shape of the rocks take one of them and record the sam edata again.Look at the rock with the loupe and put the rock with the rough you saved. Do this throughout the entire polishing process and you'll have a very good reference for not only "knowing what you're supposed to see with the loupe,but,you'll also have a record of of the type of rock you're tumblig for the next time you tumble the same material!! Hope this help a little!! Tom
|
|
deepsouth
fully equipped rock polisher
He who rocks last rocks best
Member since January 2004
Posts: 1,256
|
Post by deepsouth on Jul 31, 2004 0:29:12 GMT -5
To Tom,
Hi Tom.. I asked about the recharge as I had a batch which did not shine like it should do after the polish and soap cycle. So I did put that batch back in 600 grit, Hoping that they will come up tops .
Thanks for your reply , much appreciated . One would think that when grit reduces to 1/2 what it was , why bother changing to finer grit, just leave it in the excisting grit long enough till it is very very fine anyway, but I have a feeling that it has been tried without success so we will keep on going from coarse grit to fine grit etc.
Jack
|
|