Deleted
Deleted Member
Member since January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2012 9:19:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by geoff on Aug 3, 2012 9:50:20 GMT -5
I hate gun control.
|
|
rxscram
spending too much on rocks
Member since August 2011
Posts: 484
|
Post by rxscram on Aug 3, 2012 9:58:25 GMT -5
Gun control... use both hands.
|
|
unclestu
Cave Dweller
WINNER OF THE FIRST RTH KILLER CAB CONTEST UNCLESTU'S AGUA NUEVA AGATE
Member since April 2011
Posts: 2,298
|
Post by unclestu on Aug 3, 2012 10:08:42 GMT -5
If one person wants to kill another person they will use what ever means is at their disposal. It has been going on since the beginning of time
|
|
herchenx
Cave Dweller
Member since January 2012
Posts: 3,360
|
Post by herchenx on Aug 3, 2012 10:37:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jakesrocks on Aug 3, 2012 10:57:41 GMT -5
Cars kill people. Ban cars. Ride a horse. Oops ! That's right, people have been killed being bucked off a horse. Ban everything.
|
|
Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,472
|
Post by Sabre52 on Aug 3, 2012 11:34:27 GMT -5
Know what kills people? People kill people. Lets ban people. Must admit though, ole Hopper has tried to kill me a time or two, but I'm sure he didn't mean nothing by it *L*....Mel
|
|
|
Post by Rockoonz on Aug 3, 2012 12:27:38 GMT -5
Libs would have us all in our own personal impermeable little bubbles "to keep us safe" Lee
|
|
|
Post by helens on Aug 3, 2012 12:36:36 GMT -5
The biggest gun control fanatic today is still Brady... a REPUBLICAN, whom I read was still beating up Obama to do something about gun control.
It's a moot point, there's no way in hell they are going to ban guns, EITHER side.
And I agree, cars kill way more people than anything else man has yet come up with, and no one has tried to ban cars.
The stupid thing about blaming guns is that a kid who can buy guns can make bombs and still mass kill people. And as Jim pointed out in the article, knives? Swords? Baseball bats? As Mel said, they can try to ban people, but besides that, blaming a tool for what a user does with it is ridiculous.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Member since January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2012 12:41:32 GMT -5
I would like to see them ban birthdays so I would not get any older. But then we would have to ban babies like China so the population does not explode and the people with babies would have them forever. Wow, I could have grand kids forever. that would be cool. Jim
|
|
grayfingers
Cave Dweller
Member since November 2007
Posts: 4,575
|
Post by grayfingers on Aug 3, 2012 12:42:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by helens on Aug 3, 2012 13:41:07 GMT -5
LMAO! I LOVED that video:)
|
|
Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,472
|
Post by Sabre52 on Aug 3, 2012 15:20:47 GMT -5
Gotta love that Denny Crane. Lock and load *L*
I reckon any person, Republican or Democrat would not like guns much if someone shot them in the head. I'd probably dislike horses if one kicked me in the head. However, Brady's drive to ban guns is just insane. A gun, that shoots you in the head, requires a person to pull the trigger. It's just a tool and has no intent on it's own. Just like a car that runs you over. Following Brady's premise, horses should certainly be banned because sometimes they try, on purpose, to kick you in the head.
Besides, there are literally hundreds of millions of guns already in circulation in the US and guns are not built to wear out fast. They last many years and even if banned, who's gonna confiscate them because there sure would not be a lot of folks turning them in without a fight. The only thing any kind of gun ban in the US would do is create a whole new class of criminals out of legal gun owners and way too many of them for our jails. Meanwhile, real criminals don't giver a dang and still have their guns, which are illegal for them to own in the first place, and are a massive threat for an unarmed population of helpless sheep. Last I looked, countries that have banned firearms have increased crime not decreased. And these folks, have no defense against a predatory government either. It's guns that keep America free....Mel
|
|
Fossilman
Cave Dweller
Member since January 2009
Posts: 20,688
|
Post by Fossilman on Aug 3, 2012 20:44:17 GMT -5
"Gun control" is hitting your target!!
|
|
|
Post by jakesrocks on Aug 3, 2012 21:55:36 GMT -5
Had a little gun control on the damned 13 stripe gopher that has been digging up my front yard this afternoon.
|
|
darstcreek77
has rocks in the head
Member since April 2011
Posts: 673
|
Post by darstcreek77 on Aug 3, 2012 22:38:00 GMT -5
The biggest gun control fanatic today is still Brady... a REPUBLICAN, whom I read was still beating up Obama to do something about gun control. It's a moot point, there's no way in hell they are going to ban guns, EITHER side. And I agree, cars kill way more people than anything else man has yet come up with, and no one has tried to ban cars. The stupid thing about blaming guns is that a kid who can buy guns can make bombs and still mass kill people. And as Jim pointed out in the article, knives? Swords? Baseball bats? As Mel said, they can try to ban people, but besides that, blaming a tool for what a user does with it is ridiculous. ITS not brady its his wife , and the biggest gun hater is not a repub but dem a new york or new jersey charles schumer just like every other lib do as I say not as I do ,,,
|
|
Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,472
|
Post by Sabre52 on Aug 4, 2012 10:10:22 GMT -5
Holder's idea of gun control is to force gun American dealers to sell guns to criminals, wait till the guns are lost and criminals kill a bunch of folks, and then lie about his involvement and blame gun dealers and legal gun owners in America for being the source of the guns used in all the crimes. And that in a nutshell, is why Holder is hiding behind executive privilege and being held in contempt of congress...Mel
|
|
|
Post by helens on Aug 4, 2012 14:29:02 GMT -5
Well Holder was a 3 President political appointee, for Reagan Bush and Obama. Do you think Holder has a problem with guns? No.
Now if people kill people and not guns kill people, why are you complaining about those guns? Mel, you want them banned?
|
|
|
Post by jakesrocks on Aug 4, 2012 14:39:36 GMT -5
Helen, need we remind you that this administration just banned the re-importing of a large load of Springfield rifles ? Yes, these were ex military rifles. But they are bolt action rifles. Not semi or fully automatic. And a type of gun highly sought by collectors and hunters alike.
If they'll ban these collectable guns, then it's a very easy next step for them to ban all imports of guns.
|
|
|
Post by helens on Aug 4, 2012 14:46:31 GMT -5
Helen, need we remind you that this administration just banned the re-importing of a large load of Springfield rifles ? Yes, these were ex military rifles. But they are bolt action rifles. Not semi or fully automatic. And a type of gun highly sought by collectors and hunters alike. If they'll ban these collectable guns, then it's a very easy next step for them to ban all imports of guns. Here's the thing Jake... you have 2 sides... one side likes guns (most of us), other side doesn't. It's not even a party thing, BOTH sides have people that support guns and want guns banned. When you have 2 sides that are in complete opposition, the ONLY right thing to do is to give both sides something... compromise. It can never 100% go completely for one side, and that's just something we have to learn to live with... it's called being FAIR. The other side has to deal with our gun shows, our concealed weapons permits, our firing ranges, etc etc. We have to give a little, even if we don't want to, because they have to give too. Anyway, that just means your Springfield bolt action rifle is worth more, and if you don't have one, the guy you buy it from will be happier because you'll pay more:).
|
|