bushmanbilly
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2008
Posts: 4,719
|
QE-3
Aug 23, 2012 17:28:19 GMT -5
Post by bushmanbilly on Aug 23, 2012 17:28:19 GMT -5
|
|
robsrockshop
has rocks in the head
Member since August 2012
Posts: 715
|
QE-3
Aug 27, 2012 7:37:13 GMT -5
Post by robsrockshop on Aug 27, 2012 7:37:13 GMT -5
There's already secretly been QE3, but they'll still call it that if/when it happens. I'm pretty sure people would be up in arms if the non-Federal reserve would really let us see their books.
|
|
|
QE-3
Aug 27, 2012 12:37:03 GMT -5
Post by helens on Aug 27, 2012 12:37:03 GMT -5
I agree with Rob:).
|
|
|
QE-3
Aug 27, 2012 14:38:56 GMT -5
Post by parfive on Aug 27, 2012 14:38:56 GMT -5
“Rich. i remember you saying that there will be no need for QE-3.” You remember wrong. I’ve never mentioned QE-1, 2 , or 3. Not à la Bernanke, nor any of Her Majesty’s boats.
|
|
bushmanbilly
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2008
Posts: 4,719
|
QE-3
Aug 27, 2012 17:59:30 GMT -5
Post by bushmanbilly on Aug 27, 2012 17:59:30 GMT -5
Don’t need QE3, Bushman. Didn’t need 1 or 2 either. Just the thought of that $6.55/barrel discount on Canuck tarballs is all the stimulus I need. ;D
|
|
|
QE-3
Aug 27, 2012 18:56:12 GMT -5
Post by parfive on Aug 27, 2012 18:56:12 GMT -5
Ah, so it’s you that keeps bringing it up, eh? Kind of an odd fixation for a Canuck, but whatever. ;D I simply said *I* had no need for it, Bushman. My financial well-being doesn’t depend on anything coming out of DC.
|
|