|
Post by petrifiedwoodaddict on Jul 18, 2016 19:43:39 GMT -5
From reading many posts I get the impression that: 1. Its action is very gentle 2. Takes less grit 3. ?
Are these assumptions correct? Anything else?
I've found the UV-10 to be a bit aggressive. Though, I'm running it right now with a lot of small ceramic media and it seems to be running smoother than usual.
Thanks, Chris
|
|
ubermenehune
spending too much on rocks
Member since March 2016
Posts: 293
|
Post by ubermenehune on Jul 18, 2016 20:36:21 GMT -5
The only reason I went with a Lot-O over a UV-10 was cost. I'd love to have a UV-10 for its increased capacity.
|
|
|
Post by orrum on Jul 19, 2016 10:46:46 GMT -5
It's a case of what you start with and figure out is what you love!!!
|
|
herchenx
Cave Dweller
Member since January 2012
Posts: 3,360
|
Post by herchenx on Jul 19, 2016 13:40:45 GMT -5
I picked the UV-10 because of its capacity and the fact I didn't have to do any engineering to use it (Lot-O required getting a cinder block and attaching it.) I do like it but am still interested in owning a Lot-O at some point.
|
|
|
Post by petrifiedwoodaddict on Jul 19, 2016 19:51:44 GMT -5
I'd like a UV-45 but $800 including a polishing barrel. Ouch!
Wonder how hard it is to build your own vibratory tumbler.
|
|