chassroc
Cave Dweller
Rocks are abundant when you have rocktumblinghobby pals
Member since January 2005
Posts: 3,586
|
Post by chassroc on Jan 20, 2006 14:05:33 GMT -5
Let's see: 1) No rain for how long now in the Southwest 2) No snow cover(and 55 degrees) in Massachusetts 3) Hurricanes into December and tornados in the ocean off the coast of Florida. ...and the list goes on and on
Does anyone still doubt that "GLOBAL WARMING" is occurring, that we are part of the cause, and that it will only become more severe?
|
|
greenmann
spending too much on rocks
Member since August 2005
Posts: 325
|
Post by greenmann on Jan 20, 2006 15:22:56 GMT -5
lol, look around then Ron. Glacial National Park may not have any glaciers left in twenty years if the current warming trend continues. The water currents that power the El Nino and La Nina weather patterns in the Pacific that used to be on a 10-20 year pattern have fallen apart so much that now the scientists can't predict what its gonna do from one year to the next. Both poles have smaller and smaller winter ice pack each year. Major deserts across the globe are growing, and rain forests are shrinking.
Here in the northwest we may be getting record rainfall, but at least that seems more normal for here. The drought last winter was freaky. But those extremes are exactly what the models for Global Warming predict- more extreme temps, more extreme storms, and generally more warmer than cold, though it will get colder in some area in winter as well. And drier... especially if we keep cutting down all the trees.
|
|
|
Post by Cher on Jan 20, 2006 15:48:26 GMT -5
Trees are a renewable resource in most places but for places like the rain forest, they should take more care with it.
|
|
offbeat
no posts
Member since May 2010
Posts: 0
|
Post by offbeat on Jan 20, 2006 15:57:52 GMT -5
Our weather has been near normal too, another couple of months Ron and this snow might give way to some rockhounding!!
Well Barbara Streisand had this figured out long ago, she even knows who is to blame.......
|
|
|
Post by Alice on Jan 20, 2006 16:03:02 GMT -5
I think it has to do with magnetic north shifting. They say the US / Canada border is moving it's way to the equator
|
|
greenmann
spending too much on rocks
Member since August 2005
Posts: 325
|
Post by greenmann on Jan 20, 2006 16:27:14 GMT -5
Well, trees are only renewable if you let them grow... and even then it takes at least 5-10 years depending on the species and climate for them to do any significant climate mitigation, or even erosion control. A big part of this is of course how we cut them... if we selectively cut the forest then it would remain intact and be truly "renewable" in every sense of the word. Clearcutting on the other hand is like strip mining the forest... it doesn't leave much behind. And in many parts of the world, the overwhelming trend is to cut and then "develope" the land. In Latin America, they tend to cut the forest, farm a few years, then turn it to cow pasture. Here in the states, in many areas the forest is getting chopped into pieces to make way for golf courses and suburban developements. Trees, of course, are one of the biggest organic "sinks" of carbon. When we cut the forest, we loose their ability to sequester carbon, shade the earth in summer and keep things warmer in winter, mitigate against flood and drought, and we loose an amazing amount of habitat for the other critters that call our backyards home. Ok, I better stop before someone pushes me off the soapbox again
|
|
|
Post by Cher on Jan 20, 2006 17:42:29 GMT -5
We have a lot of aspen up here and the loggers do a lot of clear cutting up in that type of tree. The nice thing about aspen is it's a "weed tree". Within a year any place that's been clear cut is filling back in and it naturally thins itself out. My father-in-law was in logging for many years. When I started driving truck for them, we were hauling out of places he'd cut years before. Another thing the state does up here is to make critter habitats. They'll select places the loggers cut and have them go in and pile the branches to make hidey holes for them. Then they follow in after and toss in some grass seed or clover. *smile* Ok, I'll get down beside you before we both fall.
|
|
thewiz
has rocks in the head
"What good is money if you don't spend it"
Member since January 2004
Posts: 735
|
Post by thewiz on Jan 20, 2006 17:58:23 GMT -5
i work outside all year long as a site manger for my brother and this is a weekly talk with all the different subs that came in and work for him. just what we all talked about today as we were working next to the delaware river that was over flowing it's banks.
|
|
KG1960
has rocks in the head
Member since August 2008
Posts: 512
|
Post by KG1960 on Jan 20, 2006 22:42:05 GMT -5
My opinion is that I don't think the question is whether or not the overall climate of the earth is getting warmer because it is for reasons already stated plus the fact that only about 15,000 years ago (a short time on a geological scale) glaciers covered quite a bit of N. America and other parts of the earth. Now there are few glaciers. All existing glaciers are presently receding. Therefore, it is warmer now that it was 15,000 yrs ago.
However, the real question is, what is causing the warming? How much of the warming is due to human activity? Can something be done about it? Should we do something, and if so, what?
|
|
|
Post by akansan on Jan 21, 2006 0:58:34 GMT -5
You know, the funny thing is as N. America has been experiencing warmer, freakish weather, supposedly Europe has been experiencing colder weather.
It's just shifting. One of the studies I read was talking about the glaciering of Europe. *shrug*
Weather changes. I'm currently living in an area that used to be an ocean. Now it's a desert.
|
|
|
Post by Alice on Jan 22, 2006 17:41:54 GMT -5
I think the earth is going in cycles... first it was warm when we had dinosaurs (what killed them? the heat maybe? a meteor? maybe some alien life form killed them off to make room for more intelligent life?...who knows) ... then the ice age came, and mamals came... and then things got warmer, and will get warmer still... then it'll probably get cold again and freeze up, and just keep going in cycles.
now it's getting warm again. It's like the earth has a fever. It has to run it's coarse before it can "repair" itself. Or it's just killing everything off slowly so it can start all over again.
|
|
MichiganRocks
starting to spend too much on rocks
"I wasn't born to follow."
Member since April 2007
Posts: 154
|
Post by MichiganRocks on Jan 22, 2006 18:03:17 GMT -5
I agree Alice. We worry about the Earth changing only because it's inconvenient to us. That doesn't mean it's a wrong thing for the Earth. For the bulk of it's existence, the Earth hasn't had ice caps. One could argue that having ice caps is the wrong thing. Of course melting them is inconvenient for places like New York City, but that's what we humans are supposed to be so good at, adapting. We call it global warming, but the Earth is colder than it's been for the majority of it's life. The real way to stop the effects of humans on the planet, is to eliminate humans from the planet. Don't think anyone would vote for that solution. Things change. You adjust, or you suffer the consequences. Ron
|
|
fatrichie
has rocks in the head
Member since July 2004
Posts: 651
|
Post by fatrichie on Jan 22, 2006 22:59:22 GMT -5
There has to be a connection of some kind to all the pollution humans have caused. But, scientist also agree that the Earth's various climate's are cyclic. When I was growing up out here in Oregon in the 1960's, It rained from October through June, and always poured on July Fourth. For the last 25 or 30 years, we have been dry for the most part into November, some slight rain January though maybe March, then spotty rain through May. I think we are are experiencing a bit of both a return to a more normal pattern (in Oregon) and some warming. But the everyone blames the US and South America for logging and driving the earth to destuction. I've got news for you. China aint helping matters much! They have one or two more folks than we do, and they are much more lax on environmental issues than we are. They don't give two hoots what enviros say either. Africa, the middle east, eastern Europe, they don't have must respect for environmental concerns either. On logging, I work in a wood There are a couple common mis-conceptions about loggers and the logging industry. 1. They want to cut down ALL the old growth timber. This is BS. There is one mill in Oregon equiped to cut old growth into lumber. And they are a specialty mill that does it more as a nessessity. It is cheaper and more profitable nowdays to mill smaller logs. Fir trees now only take a few years to become viable timber. 2. Loggers don't care about the environment, they won't stop till they cut down all the trees. C'mon, logger minus trees = no job. Loggers today call it sustained yield harvesting, loggers of old called it tree farming. There are without a doubt bad apples amongst the loggers. There are in every group. Like the brilliant folks from ELF (Earth Liberation Front) that emptied 25 gallons of engine oil from a customer's log loader onto the ground on forest service land. So they could fill the engine with water to ruin it! DUH! Where did the dirty oil go!!! Ah crap, my soapbox broke!! Damn plastic soap box!
|
|
|
Post by LCARS on Jan 23, 2006 3:30:49 GMT -5
This winter in the Pacific Northwest it has been much warmer & wetter than usual so far...
|
|
rollingstone
starting to spend too much on rocks
Member since July 2009
Posts: 236
|
Post by rollingstone on Jan 23, 2006 4:29:30 GMT -5
Here in central Alberta, we usually have a solid snow-cover for almost 5 months of the year, from early November to the end of March. It's now late January, and we still have only a trace of snow on the ground -- this has NEVER happened here in more than 100 years of weather records. And I've got to say, 5 months of winter is too long. If climate change is going to shorten that, that is okay with me. If I were living in a hot climate, maybe I would look at things differently, so there is definitely some personal-perspective to climate change.
To put it into a rock tumbling perspective, I bust up my rough rocks in the backyard, so I normally stop this from the end of October to early April, as busted rocks tend to fly away and get swallowed by the snow. But today I was able to get out and crack some rough in the backyard, something I never dreamed I would be doing in late January, ever. So climate change can be a good thing for my rock tumbling activities. On the other hand, I rely on good ice formation on the river to bulldoze the sediments each winter, exposing fresh material for my next summer search. I guess there are two sides to every coin.
|
|
thehawke
freely admits to licking rocks
My Lord and Master
Member since January 2006
Posts: 866
|
Post by thehawke on Jan 23, 2006 10:29:20 GMT -5
I don't buy the argument of "well china is doing it so why can't we?" That type of argument never worked with my mom, I bet it didn't work with your mom and yet it still seems to be a favorite.
After seeing all the mudslides around here, you can't tell me clearcutting has no effect on the stability of the terrain. Not to mention we could save alot of trees if the government didnt have its head so far up its arse and allowed production of industrial hemp. It can make any paper product currently made by trees. We are the only industrialized nation with this ridiculous prohibition. The DEA tried (and, thankfully, failed) to ban food products that contain industrial hemp. The seeds, for instance, are extremely tasty and hemp oil is an EXCELLENT source of Omega-3 fatty acids. And the THC in industrial hemp is in trace amounts, compared to the 7% or so in the smokeable kind. So industrial hemp for paper, clothing, tasty food products, biodiesel and more and yet we can't grow it here.
Oh wait, what was the question? Global warming. The kyoto protocol was imperfect as all treaties tend to be. But it was a start and not signing it because global warming supposedly doesn't exist once again makes us a laughingstock.
Union of Concerned Scientists id just one group that has proven that trapped gases in the atmosphere help create this greenhouse effect. Trapped gasses caused by, oh, i dunno, CARS and FOSSIL FUEL PRODUCTION for one. To me, it seems like saying there is no global warming is just whistling past the graveyard.
ELF is a bunch of lousy criminals. I am not too fond of PETA either.
|
|
MichiganRocks
starting to spend too much on rocks
"I wasn't born to follow."
Member since April 2007
Posts: 154
|
Post by MichiganRocks on Jan 23, 2006 11:17:33 GMT -5
Hey, I'm all for the hemp! Ron
|
|
|
Post by xenaswolf on Jan 23, 2006 13:11:35 GMT -5
I guess what it all boils down to, as usual, is the almighty buck. If the government and its officials and their cohorts can't make a buck, it doens't happen. If they allowed production of industrial hemp, the paper/lumber industry wouldn't make their money and so on and so forth. Just like biodiesel and other alternative fuels. I just wish that the good of the planet would come before the almighty buck
|
|
thehawke
freely admits to licking rocks
My Lord and Master
Member since January 2006
Posts: 866
|
Post by thehawke on Jan 23, 2006 13:26:56 GMT -5
Dont forget the cotton industry. And the pesticide industry.
|
|
|
Post by parfive on Jan 23, 2006 16:26:33 GMT -5
And who's behind virtually any industry?
CORPORATIONS!
Rich
|
|