fatrichie
has rocks in the head
Member since July 2004
Posts: 651
|
Post by fatrichie on Jan 24, 2006 2:08:28 GMT -5
Whoa Hawke,
What I said was that China and the others are doing far worse than us, and what we do will help, but not if we (the U.S.) are the only ones making an effort.
And as for clear cutting, I flew over Oregon and Washington a few years ago and saw the devastation of clear cutting. And my customers and colleagues agree that past practices were to put it mildly, crude. But that was the extent of the technology. Until forest practices were brought under scrutiny, there was no reason to develop new methods.
Todays foresters are a different breed than the most of the past. They are the children of the old timers and are open to dialog and suggestion.
As for what was done in the past... Like so many other things in this world, they were done, we move on and make improvements.
Look, the need for wood originating products will not go away completely in our lifetime. Hemp production, bio-diesel and solar power, are all fine and desirable alternatives. But until the majority of the folks in America support them, they are just not feasible.
Bio- Diesel and methanol are subsidized by our taxes, hemp has a bad rap and solar power is too damn spendy. Not to mention iffy during winter in the Northwest!
We could all go on and on, but none of us can make it all happen tomorrow. We need to make small strides and all of us do our part. Make it easier and cheaper to be eco-conscious and it will happen. But not until. It all comes back to laziness and greed!
We are a society of waste and indulgence, but... I'd rather live here than any other country in the world, period.
|
|
fatrichie
has rocks in the head
Member since July 2004
Posts: 651
|
Post by fatrichie on Jan 24, 2006 2:14:08 GMT -5
BTW, isn't it nice to be able to have this kind of dialog. I just wish the leaders of the world could just talk this openly.
And amen to PETA and ELF sucking!
|
|
|
Post by Cher on Jan 24, 2006 9:22:19 GMT -5
One thing in logging that has changed here in MN over the past few years was done by the state. We have a great variety of trees up here, the most commonly cut were aspen, spruce, balsam and pine. We'd leave the birch and maples alone which never left an area completely clear cut. Then the state stepped in and said "Cut everything"! The paper/board mills up here were not very happy when the state told them you will use everything. I used to work at Potlatch, we used aspen, that was all. When they had to start taking in and using the others it created a lot of problems. A lot of people blame the loggers but it's not them who make the decisions on what is to be cut and what isn't. Once again it goes back to the politicians who are running the country.
|
|
MichiganRocks
starting to spend too much on rocks
"I wasn't born to follow."
Member since April 2007
Posts: 154
|
Post by MichiganRocks on Jan 24, 2006 9:44:09 GMT -5
Hey Cher, that same thing has happened in Michigan. They have clear cut for many years, but it was always the trash trees for pulp. Things have changed here and it's really getting people upset. The state has decided, in their infinite and greedy wisdom, to go in and clear cut the Oak and Maple stands. They've cut down trees that will take a hundred years or more to even begin to replace. That type of cutting is simply for the money, as that wood was so valuable. What then makes it even worse is that they keep planting Jack Pines (a trash pine) in the place of the Oaks and Maples. Nothing lives in the Jack Pines except maybe the Snowshoe Hares. But this is done because they get federal money for calling those Jack Pine plantings "Kirtland Warbler nesting areas", an endangered species. We now have literally millions of acres of Jack Pine "nesting areas". All for about half a dozen nesting birds. The Whitetail Deer is starting to get pretty scarce around here because of this. Most are now found only on private land, because the private land still has the Oak trees and other natural cover.
I'm done ranting now.
Ron
|
|
|
Post by akansan on Jan 24, 2006 12:17:00 GMT -5
Trees are funny things. I happen to live in/near one of the largest old-growth forests in the United States, and it's not in any danger of being cut for lumber as every tree is lucky to be 4 feet tall. If it started growing in a couple good years, it might get all the way up to 8 feet tall. But they are definitely oak trees! The most dangerous thing facing them would be being chopped for kindling...
Seriously though, I don't see the need for wood products every disappearing, even with eco-friendly alternatives available. Most of the eco-friendly products have problems of their own - solar devices are created using poisonous chemicals in the plants (I think it's in the glass), wind-generated energy ruins birds habitats, etc. For every proponant of an eco-friendly solution, there's another group out there opposing that solution because of what it's doing to some other habitat.
I will say we are getting more eco-concious as a nation - not as politicians or corporations, but as individuals. And for every state law that says to cut down old-growth timber for profit, there's another state law somewhere that forbids exactly that. This too is cyclical.
|
|
|
Post by Alice on Jan 24, 2006 17:37:41 GMT -5
Those have to be shortest oak trees I have ever heard of. How's the soil quality over there? I have 5 oak trees in my back yard that tower over a 2 storey house. They're beautiful trees, give off lot's of shade, ect... but watch out! Their acorns can give you a nasty bump on the head if one happens to fall on your head... and bare feet in the grass is very uncomfortable (acorns everywhere!)... they're fun to throw in the fire though. They sound like pop corn
|
|
|
Post by akansan on Jan 24, 2006 18:08:42 GMT -5
Those have to be shortest oak trees I have ever heard of. How's the soil quality over there? Let's just say we call them shrub oaks for a reason. And the soil quality is very poor, with very little rain. But the Lincoln National Forest (and surrounding area) is still a very nice place, despite the short trees.
|
|
|
Post by docone31 on Jan 24, 2006 23:27:10 GMT -5
This is a fascinating thread. I guess, we all care. My well is going dry. I live in Floriduh. The water table is three feet below the ground. They are building so fast, the water table is going down and down. Using, and treating rain water is illegal, so I keep secrets. Making a solar still is simple. No filters,, just solar evaporation. Discarded glass door panes make one unit. My wife is from the left coast. When I met her, she described herself as an Eco Feminist. Ok. Her friends were that also. I drew a conclusion. I then met her friends and found myself turning off lights in unoccupied rooms. I told her I was a conservative. I love trees. I used to hold a liscence as a liscensed arborist. Once I was doing tree work. I repaired trees. I would climb with a rope and saddle, chain saw, lines, and spend all day in the trees. Sort of Bonsai on a larger scale. One day, I was doing tree work after a major storm. The last royal elm in Cape Cod had taken a serious hit and split. I was in the tree with a drill, auger, threaded rods and a very large woman wearing a very large leather jacket went up to the tree. We were in the tree, our lines draped to the ground. We were cutting specific limbs, taking the weight off the crown, to thread rod through the tree and pull the split together. It was very old growth, very wide for a tree that close to the ocean. This woman ordinance chained herself to the tree, wearing a sign....SAVE THE TREE! She had trapped our lines and we could not go up, or down. The emergency personell who responded could not cut the chains. It was about 40*, raining, we were miserable, the tree was in a fragile state, She meant well. It has to start somewhere, excess leads to desolation. Our ignorance condemns the future. We did cable the leaders of the tree, threaded rod the main stem, and the tree survived untill the next hurricane there. It was a valiant effort on all parts, including the person, who, without asking, drew a conclusion. My wife, who still leaves lights on in empty rooms loves trees. So do I. She loves to plant, to rejuevenate the soil, and create a balance with vegetation feeding each other species. Then she saw what an hurricane can do, first hand. Trees squash homes, destroy lots of things when they fall on them, especially large ones. We had our trees pruned. I supervised the pruning. I like to think our trees will be there after the big one. Minus branches, but still there. I have observed over at least the last 40 yrs, things are different. I know jewelery, I do not really know about how to run the globe. I do try to keep trash from piling up, and I do think, if I throw it into a watershed, it will end up some where. It just doesn't go away. I try to live in my needs, and laugh at my wants. I do not always succeed. This is a great thread. I hope others read it.
|
|
greenmann
spending too much on rocks
Member since August 2005
Posts: 325
|
Post by greenmann on Jan 25, 2006 2:14:59 GMT -5
fatrichie said "We are a society of waste and indulgence, but... I'd rather live here than any other country in the world, period." Amen to that! I was a Peace Corps volunteer in Panama a few years back. It was a wonderful experience, but I am very glad to call the US my home.
I had to laugh at the Jack Pine habitat refference. Wherehouser is trying to use the same arguments here with hybrid poplar plantations for paper pulp. Of course, the birds rarely are seen in these trees cause they are generally too dense to make decent habitat, sprayed with pesticides etc to control "pests" that the birds think of as food (and would sicken from if they DID stick around to eat the poisoned insects), and lack all the other species that are used by all the other creatures that would make it a real habitat. Big Timber just doesn't seem to remember basic biology that habitat is more than just a single species. Of course, the environmentalists often aren't much better. Focusing on individual species to "protect" is often a frustrating and ultimately very disouraging way to try and manage our public lands and the natural treasures they hold.
"Excess leads to desolation" Very wise words Doc. I wish someone would whisper that in Dubya's ear the next time he goes off on something.
|
|
rollingstone
starting to spend too much on rocks
Member since July 2009
Posts: 236
|
Post by rollingstone on Jan 25, 2006 5:28:27 GMT -5
The view from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada -- climate change? Or year-to-year variability? You decide. January 26,2003, view from my front door: Three years later -- January 24,2006, view from my front door:
|
|
|
Post by texasrockhound on Jan 25, 2006 10:34:39 GMT -5
I just heard on the news this morning that 2005 was the hottest year (mean tempurature) ever recorded since they began keeping records......
|
|
MichiganRocks
starting to spend too much on rocks
"I wasn't born to follow."
Member since April 2007
Posts: 154
|
Post by MichiganRocks on Jan 25, 2006 11:28:40 GMT -5
Just read this article:
Baffled Scientists Say Less Sunlight Reaching Earth
Robert Roy Britt LiveScience Managing Editor
After dropping for about 15 years, the amount of sunlight Earth reflects back into space, called albedo, has increased since 2000, a new study concludes.
That means less energy is reaching the surface. Yet global temperatures have not cooled during the period.
Increasing cloud cover seems to be the reason, but there must also be some other change in the clouds that's not yet understood.
"The data also reveal that from 2000 to now the clouds have changed so that the Earth may continue warming, even with declining sunlight," said study leader Philip R. Goode of the New Jersey Institute of Technology. "These large and peculiar variabilities of the clouds, coupled with a resulting increasing albedo, presents a fundamental, unmet challenge for all scientists who wish to understand and predict the Earth's climate."
Cloud changes
Earth's albedo is measured by noting how much reflected sunlight in turn bounces off the Moon, something scientists call earthshine. The observations were made at the Big Bear Solar Observatory in California.
The findings will be published Jan. 24 in Eos, a weekly newspaper of the American Geophysical Union.
On any given day, about half of Earth is covered by clouds, which reflect more sunlight than land and water. Clouds keep Earth cool by reflecting sunlight, but they can also serve as blankets to trap warmth.
High thin clouds are better blankets, while low thick clouds make better coolers.
Separately, satellite data recently showed that while the difference between high and low clouds had long been steady at 7-8 percent, in the past five years, for some unknown reason, the difference has jumped to 13 percent. High, warming clouds have increased while low clouds have decreased.
Research shows condensation trails, or contrails from jet airplanes, fuel more high-altitude clouds. But they have not been shown to account for all the observed change.
What about global warming?
Earth's albedo appears to have experienced a similar reversal during a period running from the 1960s to the mid-1980s.
Goode's team says there may be a large, unexplained variation in sunlight reaching the Earth that changes over the course of two decades or so, as well as a large effect of clouds re-arranging by altitude.
How do the findings play into arguments about global warming and the apparent contribution by industrial emissions? That's entirely unclear.
"No doubt greenhouse gases are increasing," Goode said in a telephone interview. "No doubt that will cause a warming. The question is, 'Are there other things going on?'"
What is clear is that scientists don't understand clouds very well, as a trio of studies last year also showed.
"Clouds are even more uncertain than we thought," Goode said.
|
|
chassroc
Cave Dweller
Rocks are abundant when you have rocktumblinghobby pals
Member since January 2005
Posts: 3,586
|
Post by chassroc on Jan 25, 2006 11:44:22 GMT -5
Doc Says "Using, and treating rain water is illegal"...
That just sounds too absurd for words! I thought it was fairly common to catch rain water from roofs in tropical climates, everyone does it on certain islands...My Dad always collected rain water in a barrel to water his gardens, I only seem to do it during droughts
csroc
|
|
offbeat
no posts
Member since May 2010
Posts: 0
|
Post by offbeat on Jan 25, 2006 13:01:40 GMT -5
Hey Doc! Glad to see that there are still some that think in color instead of just black and white....
|
|
|
Post by Alice on Jan 25, 2006 14:10:51 GMT -5
Thanks for the article. Interesting read.
Just like space, the earth is one mysterious place that we know very little about, even if we do live here.
|
|
|
Post by Alice on Jan 25, 2006 16:59:37 GMT -5
thought this was interesting... not realy about climate change... or maybe it is... It's about New Zealand's prehistoric Kauri forests which thrived 50,000 years ago www.ancientkauri.co.nz/history.html
|
|
greenmann
spending too much on rocks
Member since August 2005
Posts: 325
|
Post by greenmann on Jan 26, 2006 17:30:55 GMT -5
the kauri story is pretty cool... but did anyone else wonder what that log would have looked like petrifid? after all, that is more or less how the process starts! Given a millenia or two
|
|
|
Post by BAZ on Jan 26, 2006 22:01:32 GMT -5
Nobody knows.
We are such a naive species. Save the planet! We can't save something that we are just starting to understand and destroy at the same time. The earth will just flick us off of her back like we were fleas. The she'll start over.
We are too minute to destroy earth, earth will destroy us. Opposable thumbs don't make us the end all.
Pessimism rears it's ugly head with me tonight.
|
|
|
Post by Cher on Jan 26, 2006 23:46:58 GMT -5
I just heard on the news this morning that 2005 was the hottest year (mean tempurature) ever recorded since they began keeping records...... We are in our eighth month of above normal temps and below normal precip. January for us up here is the warmest ever recorded.
|
|
fatrichie
has rocks in the head
Member since July 2004
Posts: 651
|
Post by fatrichie on Jan 27, 2006 0:14:13 GMT -5
The earth will just flick us off of her back like we were fleas. The she'll start over. We are too minute to destroy earth, earth will destroy us. Opposable thumbs don't make us the end all. This thread sure is bringing out the philosophical side of the members! Those are damn good lines too Baz. I'd also like to thank everyone contributing to this thread for being so civilized with the discussion. It is very refreshing for ME, living where I do, to have a grown up talk about this subject. No finger pointing, bad mouthing, trash talking, my way is the only way rhetoric. I'm used to getting lambasted on message boards for not being a hardcore environmentalist. Rich
|
|