Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,473
|
Post by Sabre52 on Aug 24, 2013 13:06:25 GMT -5
*L* How about lobotomize instead, cause their brains definitely ain't right and so many libs are also gays that they ain't breeders anyway.....Mel
|
|
|
Post by helens on Aug 24, 2013 13:19:41 GMT -5
YAY! I found some Republican T-shirts!! What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by jakesrocks on Aug 24, 2013 13:43:15 GMT -5
I think Jesus was a liberal 2013 years ago, when liberalism stood for something beside complete government takeover of our lives.
|
|
|
Post by helens on Aug 24, 2013 14:05:00 GMT -5
I think Jesus was a liberal 2013 years ago, when liberalism stood for something beside complete government takeover of our lives. Take over our lives by feeding the hungry, healing the sick and giving hope to the helpless? How terrible.
|
|
|
Post by jakesrocks on Aug 24, 2013 14:13:02 GMT -5
Take over by feeding the useless, healing the illegals And giving our tax dollars to the worthless. How else can the libs buy votes ?
|
|
|
Post by helens on Aug 24, 2013 14:16:44 GMT -5
Buy votes? Liberals don't need to buy votes Don. Doing the right thing doesn't cost money, just takes a heart.
|
|
|
Post by jakesrocks on Aug 24, 2013 14:18:02 GMT -5
25 liberal/Democrat jokes to start your day Funny Liberal/Democrat Jokes To Start Your Day
1. Q: What do you get when you offer a Liberal a penny for his thoughts? A: Change.
2. Q: How do you confuse a Liberal? A: You don’t. They’re born that way.
3. Q: Why is it good to have a Democrat passenger? A: You can park in the handicap zone.
4. Q: What’s the difference between Elvis and a smart Liberal? A: Elvis has been sighted.
5. A Democrat died and a friend went around collecting for a fund for his funeral. A woman was asked to donate ten dollars. “Ten dollars?” she said. “It only takes ten dollars to bury a Democrat? Here’s a hundred – go bury 10 of them!”
6. Q: How do you keep a Democrat busy? A: Write ‘Please turn over’ on both sides of a piece of paper.
7. Q: How do you keep a Liberal busy all day? A: Put him in a round room and tell him to wait in the corner.
8. Q: What do you call a Democrat with an IQ of 130? A: A foursome
9. Q: How do you get a one-armed Liberal out of a tree? A: Wave to him.
10. Q: What do you call a basement full of Liberals? A: A whine cellar.
11. Q: What is the definition of gross ignorance? A: 144 Democrats.
12. Q: What is foreplay for a Democrat? A: Thirty minutes of begging.
13. Q: What is the Democrat doing when he holds his hands tightly over his ears? A: Trying to hold on to a thought.
14. Q: Why did the Liberal have blisters on his lips? A: From trying to blow out lightbulbs.
15. Q: Why do Liberals work seven days a week? A: So you don’t have to retrain them on Monday.
16. A Democrat found a magic genie’s lamp and rubbed it. The genie said, “I will grant you one wish.” He said, “I wish I were smarter”. So the genie made him a Republican.
17. Q: What the difference between a Democrat and the rear end of a horse? A: I don’t know either.
18. Q: How is a Liberal different from a sewer rat? A: Some people actually like sewer rats.
19. Q: How many Democrats does it take to change a light bulb? A: None. They prefer to walk in the dark.
20. Q: Why do so many Liberals live in L.A.? A: It’s the only city that is easy enough for them to spell.
21. Q: What’s five miles long and has an IQ of forty? A: A Democrat parade.
22. Q: What is it called when a Liberal blows in another Liberal’s ear? A: Data transfer.
23. Q: Why don’t they let Liberals swim in the ocean? A: Because they can’t get the smell out of the tuna.
24. Q: How do you plant dope? A: Bury a Democrat.
25. Q: What’s the difference between a Liberal and a sack of manure? A: The sack.
|
|
|
Post by jakesrocks on Aug 24, 2013 14:20:57 GMT -5
Buy votes? Liberals don't need to buy votes Don. Doing the right thing doesn't cost money, just takes a heart. Ya right !! Tell that to the people now rotting in jail for buying votes last election.
|
|
|
Post by helens on Aug 24, 2013 14:25:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by helens on Aug 24, 2013 14:27:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jakesrocks on Aug 24, 2013 14:41:22 GMT -5
|
|
Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,473
|
Post by Sabre52 on Aug 24, 2013 15:17:15 GMT -5
*LOL* Ah come on Helen. Satan was a liberal, giving away promises or freebies to steal souls and enslave the people. Jesus would have been a conservative Republican. He hated big controlling, obtrusive, government and would have viewed Obama as Satan himself ( all forked tongue, empty promises and lies).
Thessalonions 3:6-18
Excerpts:
Keep away from any brother who leads an undisciplined life ( liberals)."
" and we do not eat anyone's food without paying. Instead, in toil and drudgery we work night and day in order to not burden any of you."
"If anyone is not willing to work, neither should he eat."
Early Christians while OK with helping the needy, were definitely Republican conservatives when it came to able bodied freeloading scumbags.....Mel
|
|
|
Post by helens on Aug 24, 2013 16:00:42 GMT -5
Mel, that would be true except for one thing. NO side wants to feed the lazy and useless. Bringing that up repeatedly doesn't make it true.
The debate is do we want to feed the disabled, elderly and children AT ALL. So tell me. Do you agree that the disabled, elderly and children who cannot work gets help, or should NO ONE get help? Which is it?
Because that's all the Democrats want, the deserving or helpless to get help. While my understanding of today's selfish Republicans is that NO ONE get help. You indicate that you agree with the liberal position with this statement: "Early Christians while OK with helping the needy". That IS the Democratic platform. Did you just agree that it was your platform too? You are now a liberal?
Can you explain your own position better regarding this?
|
|
|
Post by helens on Aug 24, 2013 16:11:57 GMT -5
And so we are both very clear... I want to see NO scumbags, cheaters, or able-bodied to get help. NOT ONE. We are on the same page. What should we do about it? Increase the Federal budget for enforcement and catching the cheats, incarcerating each cheat for $150,000 a year in jail, and hire more police and investigators to catch and arrest them?
OR, would you prefer to starve the disabled, sick and children by cutting them off COMPLETELY because we cannot catch all the cheats without MASSIVELY increasing Federal spending?
Which is preferable to you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Member since January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2013 16:57:58 GMT -5
I dismiss the premiss of your question. Another liberal tactic. Asking questions of false premise to back opposition into a corner. I dismiss the premise of your question and replace it with a more likely and very real scenario.
Take away all entitlements and I do not believe one child, disabled or sick person would (as you put it) starve. Not one.
Given the government backs out of ALL of the entirety of the "entitlement business" then charity and church income would swell beyond the needs, easily stepping up to fill the gap. With no parasitic government drone workers taking salaries for doing nothing from middle management of the entitlement programs, there would be far too much money available to feed them all.
I assume for the sake of this argument that I/you/we believe those government drones are able bodied capable people that can fend for themselves. It has been stated that the greatest talent in every career is being snatched up by the US government. Those folks can fend for themselves in any marketplace.
|
|
|
Post by jakesrocks on Aug 24, 2013 16:58:58 GMT -5
|
|
Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,473
|
Post by Sabre52 on Aug 24, 2013 17:08:54 GMT -5
Yes I can explain myself Helen, Democrats are disingenuous ( read, big fat liars) when it comes to all their welfare programs. They are all full of BS! Like you, they claim they are only wanting these benefits for the really needy and bemoan all the fraud and benefits given to the able bodied. In practice, they encourage permanent dependent welfare classes in order to "buy" their loyalty when it come to voting and pretty much ignore all the fraud and instead make it extra easy for laggards to game the system. If it were not for this creation of a dependent class and the attendant vote buying, Democrats would be a non party as they would never have the votes to win an election. I do not agree with your BS about Republicans wanting no one to get help. That's just more lies and scare tactic rhetoric from the left to again fool folks into voting them into power. Republicans want to limit welfare programs to those who really need them and by doing that, the programs are more likely to be long lasting, fiscally responsible, and effective. Democrats want to steal all the money from the working class to buy more and more votes with no regard for whether or not the program goes bankrupt as long as they get their place in the halls of power.....Mel
|
|
|
Post by helens on Aug 24, 2013 17:35:17 GMT -5
Republicans want to limit welfare programs to those who really need them and by doing that, the programs are more likely to be long lasting, fiscally responsible, and effective. Mel We're getting somewhere. How do the Republicans determine 'who really needs them'? By funding a larger network of investigators to catch the cheaters? By funding more prisons to house the cheaters? How do you propose we determine 'need'? How do we separate the wheat from the chaff?
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,388
|
Post by jamesp on Aug 24, 2013 17:35:26 GMT -5
*L* How about lobotomize instead, cause their brains definitely ain't right and so many libs are also gays that they ain't breeders anyway.....Mel Outpatient surgery for brain removal. Equal to splinter removal. Liberal government should be in Republican built prisons.
|
|
jamesp
Cave Dweller
Member since October 2012
Posts: 36,388
|
Post by jamesp on Aug 24, 2013 17:41:44 GMT -5
Where is my urban dictionary?
|
|