Deleted
Deleted Member
Member since January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2014 21:15:20 GMT -5
good?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Member since January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2014 21:40:48 GMT -5
sorry I meant to put this in the photo section
|
|
|
Post by roy on Mar 3, 2014 22:44:17 GMT -5
looks good to me!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Member since January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2014 22:48:59 GMT -5
thanks!
|
|
|
Post by pghram on Mar 4, 2014 15:53:59 GMT -5
Looks good to me too.
Rich
|
|
|
Post by Pat on Mar 4, 2014 17:08:20 GMT -5
I think so, too!
|
|
|
Post by 150FromFundy on Mar 4, 2014 19:14:19 GMT -5
Looks good at this scale although the edges appear to be a little fuzzy. Digital cameras have problems with focussing on sharply contrasting patterns and zebras. The "acid test" for digital photos is to use your photo viewer/editor and zoom in. Really zoom in! Are the edges still sharp? Are the boundaries of contrasting colour patterns still sharp? I did a recent post that you may find helpful. forum.rocktumblinghobby.com/thread/64571/photographing-fluorescent-minerals-uv-lightIgnore the UV parts regarding lighting and technique. The Basic Camera Settings part may give some camera settings to experiment with. Darryl.
|
|