|
Post by mohs on Jan 3, 2016 16:29:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Pat on Jan 3, 2016 17:17:03 GMT -5
Thanks, Ed. Did' t realize sand was so pretty!
Do you know what the magnification was?
|
|
Fossilman
Cave Dweller
Member since January 2009
Posts: 20,723
|
Post by Fossilman on Jan 3, 2016 17:24:19 GMT -5
Seen this before,with different photos-sand is amazing..............Thanks for sharing.........
|
|
|
Post by mohs on Jan 3, 2016 17:47:46 GMT -5
Hi Pat most those picture are magnified to at least 50 power up to at 150. If not more its the method of light refraction the author used that makes the difference
I don't think it just light from below as it is with most microscopes
|
|
|
Post by washingtonrocks on Jan 4, 2016 11:29:54 GMT -5
Amazing photos! Who would have thought that what we take for granted as "just sand" can be composed of tiny gems like tourmaline and ruby in zoisite.
|
|
|
Post by krazydiamond on Jan 4, 2016 16:22:47 GMT -5
very cool photography. KD
|
|
|
Post by mohs on Jan 4, 2016 17:09:17 GMT -5
Amazing photos! Who would have thought that what we take for granted as "just sand" can be composed of tiny gems like tourmaline and ruby in zoisite. The rubyzo may have been sand imposter
|
|
|
Post by krazydiamond on Jan 4, 2016 20:15:21 GMT -5
a long time ago, our RTH friend, DeepSouth, sent me some garnet sand from New Zealand, wonder what that would look like? It is the most amazing stuff.
KD
|
|
|
Post by mohs on Jan 5, 2016 17:12:28 GMT -5
the book only as samples from the Continental U.S. it seems but lots on garnets especially pink garnets from Big Sur beach
|
|