|
Post by 1dave on May 18, 2018 10:14:41 GMT -5
I think a hundred and fifty million years ago the Upheaval Comet detonated over southeast Texas the main part struck on the Utah Colorado border, and parts continued on to Washington State and probably Alaska. Elements such as vanadium, tantalum, niobium, and uranium was heavily injected into the plants and trees along the path, and is now causing concern in the burning of fossil fuels. pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70016022
|
|
|
Post by rockjunquie on May 18, 2018 17:48:15 GMT -5
Very cool. I've never heard of this before. Interesting about burning the fossil fuels.
|
|
|
Post by 1dave on May 18, 2018 17:55:16 GMT -5
Very cool. I've never heard of this before. Interesting about burning the fossil fuels. Nope, I'm the first to notice it. It will probably be 50 years before the main stream accepts the idea.
|
|
|
Post by 1dave on May 19, 2018 11:16:22 GMT -5
Upheaval Comet QuestionsUpheaval Dome Crater is a fact, but it does not provide enough energy to explain the related Robert's Rift, nor the Chinle fall-out on the J2 surface over a 300 mile diameter area. 1. How big was the accompanying comet? 2. Did it hit the ground or detonate at some distance above the ground? 3. Did it have anything to do with the Paradox Valley? 1. How big? Constraints. 150 million years ago Dinosaurs were smashed up against the southern side of Hardscrabble Mountain 150 miles north northeast of Upheaval Dome. I don't think that was a coincidence. There had to be enough force to push them there, but not enough to shatter nor cremate them. a 4-5 mile diameter snowball comet would do the trick. Would that be enough to create enough wind to scour down to the J2 surface and cover it with Chinle fall-out and spread uranium over a thousand mile area? 2. Did it hit the ground or detonate at some distance above the ground? I see evidence for both. What are your thoughts? 3. Did it have anything to do with the Paradox Valley? Could the Paradox Valley be a shallow impact crater? I see a central uplift, ring one, and ring two. In a straight line just 60 miles from Upheaval Dome, burrowing down to the same rock layers is too much of a coincidence for me to think they are not related.
|
|
|
Post by 1dave on May 20, 2018 10:22:48 GMT -5
Details of the Paradox Impact: Verifying the comet path is evidence of the first detonation 65 miles in the air off the coast of Texas 33 seconds before the Paradox impact, several minutes before the Upheaval Dome Impact (first impact had to settle or the ring of Uravan Mineral Belt would be pushed out of shape)- now contaminating the water wells there. The second detonation occurred over central Texas. The Comet Fragments paths:
|
|
timloco
has rocks in the head
Member since April 2012
Posts: 545
|
Post by timloco on May 20, 2018 10:24:57 GMT -5
It should be easy to prove based on the isotopes in the layer where it fell. ratios of isotopes are different in comets and asteroids than earth based elements. This is how they proved a comet ended the dinosaurs.
|
|
|
Post by 1dave on May 20, 2018 10:31:03 GMT -5
It should be easy to prove based on the isotopes in the layer where it fell. ratios of isotopes are different in comets and asteroids than earth based elements. This is how they proved a comet ended the dinosaurs. Yes, the unique combination of 4 parts vanadium to 1 part uranium and tantalum, niobium, etc. clearly ties together portions of the Upheaval Impact. The Paradox Impact is not even thought of yet, but evidence should be easily dug out of sidewall injection sites - IF anyone ever takes me seriously enough to look. Past history is that it will take 50 years. Timing of deposits in 150 million year old layers will be conclusive. A problem is that comets are composites of billions of collisions over billions of years through numerous supernova minefields. I am certain that the portion that struck Paradox is very different than the part that hit Upheaval Dome.
|
|
timloco
has rocks in the head
Member since April 2012
Posts: 545
|
Post by timloco on May 20, 2018 10:59:39 GMT -5
its not the elements themselves or the ratio of the elements but the isotopes of the elements, stuff from space has different numbers of neutrons than stuff from the earth. This can be determined with isotopic fractionation.
|
|