|
Post by Cher on Nov 5, 2004 16:12:01 GMT -5
Ok, here's pics of a few of the agates I have tumbling now. Would any of you consider buying something that still had some rough parts on it if it added to the stone? This one has some pretty neat eyes. It's a bit too rough yet on the one side, but I'd hate to lose those eyes. This one is pretty smooth all over but it's got that little bit of the yellowish outside still left. That's smoothed out pretty good but does the color distact? Same with this one, except for the darker spots. They are still a bit indented but if I go all the way to taking that out, it could lose a lot of the color over all. This one has some really rich color and very tight banding. The right side is wet to show the color better. See that dark line on the left pic, that's a hole but I'm almost afraid I lose that neat coloring in the center of the quartz, not to mention overall size. This one is known as a water-level agate, another form of a laker. It's pretty good sized, probably 2 inches long so will probably keep going with this one until the yellow is completely gone. Right side is wet to show color better. Man I wish I could slice this one in half ... doesn't it look like candy? I'm thinking of letting this one go longer to see if any of the banding comes out more on the sides. Sorry I forgot to use something for a measure but they are all from 3/4's to 2 inches long. Thanks for looking, appreciate any suggestions. Cher
|
|
|
Post by krazydiamond on Nov 5, 2004 16:20:01 GMT -5
very cool looking stones, Cher....the answer you are looking for is all dependent on what your end use is going to be....jewelry? a nice bowl full to admire?
how long have they been in 60/90?
KD
|
|
|
Post by Cher on Nov 5, 2004 16:22:25 GMT -5
They've been in 60/90 since Oct. 13. I think some of these would make some really nice pendants/wire wrapping stones which is why I was wondering about whether or not to take more off. Would you even look at something that still had some rough areas on it if it added to the stone?
Cher
|
|
JKowalski33
spending too much on rocks
Member since August 2004
Posts: 451
|
Post by JKowalski33 on Nov 5, 2004 18:14:10 GMT -5
i have the same thoughts for somes lakers i have going, they still show the outer rusty red colors, but i think ill let it stay because i think it makes them more interesting because they will be like one side has yellowish/reddish designs, and then the other side shows the banding on them.
|
|
|
Post by rockyraccoon on Nov 5, 2004 20:28:46 GMT -5
beautiful rocks cher! in that 2nd pic that little crystal cave thing always worries me cause i think grit will get transferred into the polish stage but i have had some make it through with no problem.
kim
|
|
shorty
starting to spend too much on rocks
Member since November 2004
Posts: 122
|
Post by shorty on Nov 5, 2004 20:46:52 GMT -5
buitiful why mess with perfection if you dont like send to me haha shorty
|
|
|
Post by cookie3rocks on Nov 5, 2004 22:02:52 GMT -5
If that's where they are at 60/90, I'd move on. The yellow places will be shiney yellow places and the "hole" in the one will just make it itriguing.
cookie
|
|
|
Post by Toad on Nov 6, 2004 0:30:53 GMT -5
I agree with krazydiamond. It all depends on end use. Personally, I prefer completely polished, no rough spots. But I can also see how the unfinished look would be appreciated.
I know that's not much help, but what do you expect for 2 cents?
|
|
|
Post by puppie96 on Nov 6, 2004 5:34:24 GMT -5
I'm so happy. This thread has come up just as I'm struggling with the same thing in a big way. All of those "is this anything" rocks would be destroyed by any attempt to make their shapes regular and eliminate the matrix. Plus, they have cavities full of crystals. So they will have to remain pretty natural with matrix and crystals. I don't do jewelry and I am TRYING VERY HARD not to get started making jewelry, BUT I can't help thinking about these in jewelry, and I feel very good about them. They'd be stunning, really eye catching and attention getting. This would be one of those pieces to add to your "spectacular jewelry for $50 and under" collection. They'd be really unusual and in the right market that's what they are looking for. Rambling. Just glad to get some input on this, I'm nervous about the rocks I have going.
|
|
|
Post by puppie96 on Nov 29, 2004 2:55:59 GMT -5
Hey Cher -- what did you finally decide to do with these? Could you post a follow up photo? Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by Cher on Nov 29, 2004 8:02:45 GMT -5
Hi Pup, They are still tumblin but when they are done I sure will. Actually, I have to go through the barrels today, guess I could take my camera down with me. I did do a little grinding here and there with the dremel to help them along.
Cher
|
|
|
Post by connrock on Nov 29, 2004 18:40:19 GMT -5
Some "lakers" can be a real pain to do. If you look at how much material you'll have to remove to get rid of the matrix you won't end up with much in the way of size. To me a piece of jewelry can be one of two things.Rough or finished.Personally,in most cases, I don't go for the rough/finished look. However,if the stone has a particular shape to it with no concave areas then the natural look can add to the stone and make it quite unique. My personal opinion. Tom
|
|
|
Post by puppie96 on Nov 30, 2004 0:57:06 GMT -5
Thanks, Cher. I'm looking forward to the follow up!
|
|