|
Post by Bejewelme on Jul 10, 2009 10:23:20 GMT -5
WOW, that is a beauty!!!!! And interesting story about how it orginated. Very cool, owl feathers are neat. I like the channel set stones wrapping around it. Amber
|
|
|
Post by wizardofthestone on Jul 10, 2009 10:27:13 GMT -5
Your too kind bjewelme..
However, I do have one other staff.. waiting in the corner.. But my body has to want to do this.. so it may wait a bit longer..
|
|
|
Post by NatureNut on Jul 10, 2009 10:28:15 GMT -5
Very inventive and a great use of stones. Love the natural knotting and curling. Jo
|
|
|
Post by rockmanken on Jul 10, 2009 12:49:57 GMT -5
What a great use of wood and stone. Fantastic looking staff.
About time to work on the other one, isn't it? ;D ;D ;D Just hanging around the computer make you fat. I know for a fact. ;D ;D
I'm too lazy to get up and do anything lately. Too hot. Ken
|
|
Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,494
|
Post by Sabre52 on Jul 10, 2009 13:43:04 GMT -5
Beautiful creation! I find natural creations showing such fine symmetry very appealing. Kind of a symbiosis of the organic and the inorganic....Mel
|
|
Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,494
|
Post by Sabre52 on Jul 10, 2009 14:36:58 GMT -5
Rockitman is correct. I worked raptor rehab for years and the law states birds of prey and any parts thereof including feathers. We actually had to keep all shed feathers we didn't use for imping etc and turn them over to the Native American feather repository for disposition to Native Americans. Couldn't legally give them to anyone else. Back in California, game wardens regularly raided gun shows to bust folks for Mountain Man or Indian gear that contained feathers, claws, talons etc which were illegal...Mel
|
|
|
Post by deb193redux on Jul 10, 2009 14:44:59 GMT -5
I have to agree with rockitman. Your bases are NOT covered, so much as you have been lucky. I never knew about this and I was surprised. I could easily have violated this law. I suspect the law is selectively enforced, and this is why you had no trouble - not the "channels" you mention. It seems logical that the law is so strict so as to prosecute poachers and to deny them the defense that they found the bird dead. Likewise, it seems plausible that various "officials" might not know of the law's exact provisions, nor would they care if they did unles they suspected poaching. Still a ranger or game warden having a bad day could make your day bad very fast. The reasoning you offer, and the lines of authority/permission you trace, are more fantasy than legal protection. This might even ruin the director's day or cost her job if the ranger deemed her to be trafficing because she gave you permission. Asking for permission from a director is not an exception granted by law. Nor is being friendly with a nature center or local officials. Seems you are just faling into the "selectively enforced" area - not really a direct result of your actions, though courtesy always helps. I am not one to trust selective enforcement when it comes to my own freedom. I wonder if there is not some way to rewrite this law. Mel- do you have an opinion on rewriting? I am ninded of a story in the AMFS newsletter, reprinted in teh NWFMS newsletter, abot rock collecting in state forests. ( www.amfed.org/nfms/nwnews/nw0709.pdf) Editors Note: The following article is from the AFMS Newsletter, dated June/July 2009. Although the incident below occurred in Georgia, is a similar incident possible in the Northwest? In the next issue I will publish an article closer to home.
Words of Caution
by John Wright, RPG, Conservation & Legislation Chair
If you plan on visiting the National Forest, be aware that you cannot trust the information on their “web sites” or in their brochures as Forest Service law enforcement officers use a different set of rules, regulations, and interpretations than the ones published. These inconsistencies are probably the result of poor coordination within the departments of the National Forest, and if you have ever attended any of the public forums they conduct, you know just how poorly organized they are. Unfortunately, Forest Service officials and Federal Judges invariably side with the law enforcement officers no matter how inconsistent or corrupt the circumstances may be. Dick Pankey, President of ALAA , informed me of a pending case which is very typical of what can happen that occurred in the Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests located in northern Georgia. The victims in this case are Dr. Madden, MD, and his fianceé, who were rock-hounding in compliance with the Forest Service directives, but criminally charged any way. I believe this is an important enough example that all of our members should be made aware of the problems they could encounter when visiting in “our” National Forests. Permission was granted by the victim, Dr. Madden, to use his very well written account of the circumstances, which unfortunately is very typical of a number of other similar cases being adjudicated in the South Eastern Federal Mineralogical Society (SFMS) area at the present time.
E-Mail received from Dick Pankey:
A couple of weeks ago I received the article below, THIS CAN HAPPEN TO YOU. It was written by a rockhound from Georgia. He first contacted me in early February. We have exchanged e-mails, had telephone conversations and he has provided me with other information regarding collecting in Georgia National Forests and the charges against him and his fianceé. I have begun collecting rockhounding regulations and information from BLM and FS offices around the country. So far much of the information is sketchy and vague. Written regulation and pamphlets most often don’t exist. What I have found out is that although the laws allow for collecting on BLM and FS land, each district can establish their own management plan based on their interpretation of the law and the ranger/enforcement officer enforces the management plan based upon their interpretation. And these vary widely! So, we have undocumented, inconsistent regulations, enforced by people based upon their ideas and agendas.
THIS CAN HAPPEN TO YOU
On November 1, 2008, my fianceé, Dori, and I were criminally charged with collecting Staurolites on U.S. Forest Service land. Local collectors have been going to this location to collect Staurolites for over 30 years. Our friends, Tonya and Barry, informed us of the location in Blue Ridge. We visited this area four (4) times in the summer and fall of 2008. The Staurolites we found on the surface were mostly poor quality. However, just a few inches under the surface using a scraper we found much better quality ones. We used hand tools including a scraper and a small pick. I feel we were very careful not to damage the site. We did not dig more than 6 or 7 inches and completely filled in our holes and raked the dirt to ensure the site looked undisturbed. On November 1, 2008, Officer Mike Tipton of the USFS approached us. We did not attempt to hide ourselves because we had no idea we were doing anything wrong. He stated he had set up a video camera at the site and had been watching us. This was very alarming to us. I assured him if he had approached us that first time and explained that the Forest Service did not wish us to collect here, we would have politely left and never returned. He will attest to the fact that we were cooperative. He even complimented us stating we were “not like most of the individuals he deals with.” Officer Tipton approached us and asked us what we were looking for. We told him we were looking for Staurolites. He did not know what Staurolites were, but informed us we needed a mining permit to dig for any type of mineral. He told us any Staurolites we find are government property. Next, he confiscated our scraping tools, knap sack and bucket. He separated us and read me my Miranda rights. At this point he asked me if I would allow federal agents to search my home in Rome for any other federal property. When I said “no”, my interview was over. Evidently he tried to obtain a search warrant, but was unsuccessful. Officer Tipton repeatedly inquired as to whether we sold rocks. I told him I have never sold minerals and Staurolites have only intrinsic value. In the past there have been locations in Blue Ridge (Hackney Farm) that have allowed individuals to collect a bucket of them for $5.00. On January 11, 2009, Officer Tipton gave us a courtesy call. He stated we are being charged criminally with 261.9(a) destroying a natural feature or property of the United States ($250.00 fine) and 261.9(b) removing a natural feature or property of the United States ($250.00 fine). These are criminal misdemeanor offenses and can result in a criminal record. I strongly feel the section we are being charged under is both vague and does not address the important point that we were collecting minerals. Mineral collecting is generally allowed on most U.S. Forest Service lands including public domain lands and acquired lands. Unfortunately, each individual Forest Service can now make the rules (on acquired lands) dictating the rules for rock hounding, and Georgia has one of the most restrictive policies. Under this charge it appears we are vandals or even worse thieves. I told Officer Tipton I was considering going to court. Five days later when I received my ticket it had doubled to $400.00 for each offense for a total of $2000.00. In conclusion, I feel strongly we took the utmost care to treat this land with care. We spent at least 15-20 minutes each time to leave the ground looking undisturbed. I feel the US Forest Service in Georgia is treating mineral collectors like criminals. Mineral collecting has in the past been considered a wholesome and educational activity. In other states, the US Forest Service has been much more responsive to working with mineral collectors and even encourages collecting. I am saddened that in Georgia the US Forest Service is now considering it a criminal offense. Thank you for the time you spend considering this matter. (Signed) Robert Madden, M.D.
|
|
|
Post by wizardofthestone on Jul 10, 2009 14:46:54 GMT -5
Next your going to accuse me of mineral hunting.. or worse yet.. collecting squirrel tails.. (which I do both)
I told you I'm not at fault here.. the nature center is.. for allowing me to have the feathers in the first place.. perhaps I will call the nature center again just to confirm this and make sure that the Director was aware of this fact before allowing me to have the feather.
|
|
|
Post by deb193redux on Jul 10, 2009 14:49:09 GMT -5
Such a call would be a nice thing to do. It really could cost her her job if someone wanted to be nasty.
I think the point is that while they may be at fault for assisting/abeting you, the law states that your very possession is illegial, and nothing you mention is a defense.
How do we feel about laws this strict? Are they needed? I am no friend of poachers, but I don't want to make it easy for power tripping rangers to abuse authority and selectively prosecute anyone they do not like the looks of.
|
|
|
Post by wizardofthestone on Jul 10, 2009 14:58:48 GMT -5
I have just made the call. The director informs me that I can donate the dangles, feathers or even the whole staff to the nature center.. In this case I will simply cut off the dangle and return them to the nature center..
Again I wasn't doubting anyone with this.. But just feel that:
"Why would the nature center do this to me, Knowing the laws?"
|
|
|
Post by deb193redux on Jul 10, 2009 15:04:10 GMT -5
I wonder if exceptions for native Americans are ethnic or religious. I can't convert my ethnicity, but I could convert to a particular spiritual belief if it meant I could collect feathers and rocks or arrowheads ... etc, without harassment.
Say, doesn't this apply to some hallucinogens as well.
|
|
|
Post by fishenman on Jul 10, 2009 18:37:54 GMT -5
Oh man..........................he deleted himself again
|
|
damammy
has rocks in the head
Member since January 2009
Posts: 697
|
Post by damammy on Jul 10, 2009 19:11:51 GMT -5
It is nice to learn of the laws from friends so we don't get into trouble. I also enjoy learning from others with greater knowledge when given in a soft tone as not to insult me, but to share their knowlege, in a way, that I can appreciate it. The HALF BREED
|
|
Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,494
|
Post by Sabre52 on Jul 10, 2009 20:53:06 GMT -5
Daniel: I'll admit the laws concerning raptor feathers etc are somewhat Draconian but the difficulty in any rewriting of such law lies in human nature. If one person say, collects talons or feathers from a roadkill owl and uses them in a creation, the next person, admiring that creation, might be tempted to intentionally hurry the demise of a bird of prey in order to collect the raw materials for their own creation. Thus, the need for a rather broad law. Even Amerinds can't collect the feathers themselves but need to get them from a permitted source. I know this often seems a tough bunch of laws but having witnessed a bust at a gun show where several dealers had clothing etc containing illegal talons, feathers, bear claws etc in quantity with no evidence of origin or permits etc, I can see where they were coming from. In all probability, at least some of those body parts came from illegally taken animals.......Mel
|
|
|
Post by sitnwrap on Jul 10, 2009 21:17:07 GMT -5
This turned out to be a really informative thread. I knew only of Eagle feathers being illegal to possess. Actually it is a good thing I read this because I have a hawk that visits the yard from time to time and I had been searching the area every so often in hopes of finding a feather on the ground that I could use in a design.
So, I'm really serious saying thanks for posting.
|
|
chrisperez
spending too much on rocks
Member since January 2009
Posts: 457
|
Post by chrisperez on Jul 10, 2009 22:08:38 GMT -5
There are a couple of bald eagle families here in the area, and there have been a few articles in the newspaper warning people about these laws. Even if a feather happens to turn up in your yard, we are supposed to contact the authorities or leave it undisturbed. Now, exactly how are we supposed to know what feather comes from what bird? You got me..... Also, I wish I could have seen that staff ... it was deleted before I ever saw it.....
|
|
Sabre52
Cave Dweller
Me and my gal, Rosie
Member since August 2005
Posts: 20,494
|
Post by Sabre52 on Jul 11, 2009 7:50:46 GMT -5
Interesting too that the owl in native American folklore was kind of bad ju ju, a harbinger of death and illness. The feathers however, are often used in healing ceremonies so are appropriate for a healing stick when wielded by a shaman. The feathers are supposed to form a connection to help carry messages to the creator and are therefore sacred as was the bird itself which the Amerinds even, were usually prohibited from killing. I always find it interesting just how connected to nature the Native Americans were, in every facet of their lives. Very cool!......Mel
|
|
10thumbs
spending too much on rocks
I want to be reincarnated as a dog.
Member since March 2009
Posts: 480
|
Post by 10thumbs on Jul 14, 2009 7:31:50 GMT -5
All songbirds and migratory birds that cannot be hunted may not be possessed. That includes seagulls, which are protected under federal law and thus are illegal to possess. Apparently you can't pick up a feather from those flying rats either. Who knew? [Note to self: stop feeding Alka-seltzer to the herring gulls] My kids pick up feathers over in Ontario all the time. I'll have to check the laws over there.
|
|
kjohn0102
freely admits to licking rocks
Member since April 2006
Posts: 774
|
Post by kjohn0102 on Jul 14, 2009 14:13:33 GMT -5
This is all fascinating! I'm only sorry that I did not see it before the pictures were deleted!
kj
|
|
|
Post by deb193redux on Jul 14, 2009 23:29:26 GMT -5
well since the feathers are off, never displaying it again seems kinda overkill.
... and colors are funny. You often find what you seek.
|
|